public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>, x86@kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] objtool: Fix SYSCALL instruction handling and INSN_CONTEXT_SWITCH
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2025 19:57:42 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2970eb7e-030d-4257-ad2f-64e378037dd8@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41761c1db9acfc34d4f71d44284aa23b3f020f74.1743706046.git.jpoimboe@kernel.org>

On 03/04/2025 7:48 pm, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> The !CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION version of xen_entry_SYSCALL_compat() ends
> with a SYSCALL instruction, which in reality is a hypervisor call to
> trigger an IRET.
>
> Objtool doesn't know that, so it falls through to the next function,
> triggering a false positive:
>
>   vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: xen_reschedule_interrupt+0x2a: RET before UNTRAIN
>
> Fix that by adding UD2 after the SYSCALL to avoid the undefined behavior
> and prevent the objtool fallthrough, and teach validate_unret() to stop
> control flow on the UD2 like validate_branch() already does.
>
> Unfortunately that's not the whole story.  While that works for
> validate_unret(), it breaks validate_branch() which terminates control
> flow after the SYSCALL, triggering an unreachable instruction warning on
> the UD2.
>
> The real problem here is that INSN_CONTEXT_SWITCH is ambiguous.  It can
> represent both call semantics (SYSCALL, SYSENTER) and return semantics
> (SYSRET, IRET, RETS, RETU).  Those differ significantly: calls preserve
> control flow whereas returns terminate it.
>
> validate_branch() uses an arbitrary rule for INSN_CONTEXT_SWITCH that
> almost works by accident: if in a function, keep going; otherwise stop.
> It should instead be based on the semantics of the underlying
> instruction.
>
> INSN_CONTEXT_SWITCH's original purpose was to enable the "unsupported
> instruction in callable function" warning.  But that warning really has
> no reason to exist.  It has never found any bugs, and those instructions
> are only in entry code anyway.  So just get rid of it.
>
> That in turn allows objtool to stop caring about SYSCALL or SYSENTER.
> Their call semantic means they usually don't affect control flow in the
> containing function/code, and can just be INSN_OTHER.  The far
> returns/jumps can also be ignored as those aren't used anywhere.
>
> With SYSCALL and SYSENTER, INSN_CONTEXT_SWITCH now has a sane
> well-defined return semantic.

Do you mean "without" here?

>
> Fixes: a2796dff62d6 ("x86/xen: don't do PV iret hypercall through hypercall page")
> Reported-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
> Tested-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>

Thankyou for all your help on this one.

> diff --git a/tools/objtool/arch/x86/decode.c b/tools/objtool/arch/x86/decode.c
> index 33d861c04ebd..628c2c8a0f6a 100644
> --- a/tools/objtool/arch/x86/decode.c
> +++ b/tools/objtool/arch/x86/decode.c
> @@ -535,10 +535,9 @@ int arch_decode_instruction(struct objtool_file *file, const struct section *sec
>  
>  			insn->type = INSN_JUMP_CONDITIONAL;
>  
> -		} else if (op2 == 0x05 || op2 == 0x07 || op2 == 0x34 ||
> -			   op2 == 0x35) {
> +		} else if (op2 == 0x07) {
>  
> -			/* sysenter, sysret */
> +			/* sysret */
>  			insn->type = INSN_CONTEXT_SWITCH;

Linux doesn't use SYSEXIT, but it's conceptually like SYSRET/ERETx so
perhaps worth keeping the 0x35 here?

~Andrew

  reply	other threads:[~2025-04-03 18:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-03 18:48 [PATCH] objtool: Fix SYSCALL instruction handling and INSN_CONTEXT_SWITCH Josh Poimboeuf
2025-04-03 18:57 ` Andrew Cooper [this message]
2025-04-03 19:05   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-04-03 19:15     ` Andrew Cooper
2025-04-03 19:20       ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-04-04  7:40 ` Jürgen Groß
2025-04-04 10:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-04-04 14:46   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-04-04 14:54     ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-04-04 15:02       ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-04-04 15:03     ` Juergen Gross

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2970eb7e-030d-4257-ad2f-64e378037dd8@citrix.com \
    --to=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox