public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ikke <ikke.lkml@gmail.com>
To: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ap@solarrain.com
Subject: Re: 4K vs 8K stacks- Which to use?
Date: Sun, 4 Jul 2004 12:55:07 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <297f4e0104070403553efe6821@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.60.0407030649120.13543@p500>

Hi,

I got a P2 here, and got some problems that *could* be related to 4k stacks.
I'm running 2.6.7-redeeman3 now (i.e. 2.6.7-mm3+reiser4+nick's sheduler).
If I configure it using 4k stacks and APM as module (not loaded) I get
crashes (Page Faults I think). Same configuration, but 4k stacks
disabled and APM module disabled, runs stable.

Just for your interest ;)

Regards, Ikke

On Sat, 3 Jul 2004 06:50:58 -0400 (EDT), Justin Piszcz
<jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com> wrote:
> I use an array of machines with all sorts of CPU's (but no 64bit CPU's
> yet):
> 
> Which should I use for each CPU?
> Which is better and why?
> 
> Pentium 1 CPU's
> Cyrix P150 (120MHZ)
> Pentium 2 CPU's
> Pentium 3 CPU's
> Pentium 4 W/HT
> Pentium 4 W/OUT HT
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>

  reply	other threads:[~2004-07-04 10:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-07-03 10:50 4K vs 8K stacks- Which to use? Justin Piszcz
2004-07-04 10:55 ` Ikke [this message]
2004-07-04 12:34   ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-07-05 11:06     ` Ikke
     [not found] <Pine.LNX.4.44.0407031038310.32173-100000@coffee.psychology.mcmaster.ca>
2004-07-03 14:44 ` Justin Piszcz
2004-07-03 18:48   ` William Lee Irwin III

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=297f4e0104070403553efe6821@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=ikke.lkml@gmail.com \
    --cc=ap@solarrain.com \
    --cc=jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox