From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265531AbUGDKzc (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Jul 2004 06:55:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265509AbUGDKzc (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Jul 2004 06:55:32 -0400 Received: from rproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.170.205]:52466 "HELO mproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S265633AbUGDKzI (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Jul 2004 06:55:08 -0400 Message-ID: <297f4e0104070403553efe6821@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 4 Jul 2004 12:55:07 +0200 From: Ikke To: Justin Piszcz Subject: Re: 4K vs 8K stacks- Which to use? Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ap@solarrain.com In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, I got a P2 here, and got some problems that *could* be related to 4k stacks. I'm running 2.6.7-redeeman3 now (i.e. 2.6.7-mm3+reiser4+nick's sheduler). If I configure it using 4k stacks and APM as module (not loaded) I get crashes (Page Faults I think). Same configuration, but 4k stacks disabled and APM module disabled, runs stable. Just for your interest ;) Regards, Ikke On Sat, 3 Jul 2004 06:50:58 -0400 (EDT), Justin Piszcz wrote: > I use an array of machines with all sorts of CPU's (but no 64bit CPU's > yet): > > Which should I use for each CPU? > Which is better and why? > > Pentium 1 CPU's > Cyrix P150 (120MHZ) > Pentium 2 CPU's > Pentium 3 CPU's > Pentium 4 W/HT > Pentium 4 W/OUT HT > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ >