From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266013AbUGELGX (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Jul 2004 07:06:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266016AbUGELGW (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Jul 2004 07:06:22 -0400 Received: from rproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.170.199]:37553 "HELO mproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S266013AbUGELGU (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Jul 2004 07:06:20 -0400 Message-ID: <297f4e01040705040614362b9@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2004 13:06:06 +0200 From: Ikke To: Chris Wedgwood Subject: Re: 4K vs 8K stacks- Which to use? Cc: Justin Piszcz , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ap@solarrain.com In-Reply-To: <20040704123431.GA23204@taniwha.stupidest.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <297f4e0104070403553efe6821@mail.gmail.com> <20040704123431.GA23204@taniwha.stupidest.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I will when I get my next kernel (compiling one takes some time here). On Sun, 4 Jul 2004 05:34:31 -0700, Chris Wedgwood wrote: > On Sun, Jul 04, 2004 at 12:55:07PM +0200, Ikke wrote: > > > I got a P2 here, and got some problems that *could* be > > related to 4k stacks. I'm running 2.6.7-redeeman3 now > > (i.e. 2.6.7-mm3+reiser4+nick's sheduler). If I configure > > it using 4k stacks and APM as module (not loaded) I get > > crashes (Page Faults I think). Same configuration, but 4k > > stacks disabled and APM module disabled, runs stable. > > Try turning on the stack overflow checking and see what that > spits out. > > > --cw >