From: "Jürgen Groß" <jgross@suse.com>
To: Ashish Kalra <Ashish.Kalra@amd.com>,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, luto@kernel.org,
peterz@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com,
bp@alien8.de
Cc: x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com,
rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com, mhklinux@outlook.com,
peterx@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
thomas.lendacky@amd.com, linux-coco@lists.linux.dev,
jroedel@suse.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/mm: fix lookup_address() to handle physical memory holes in direct mapping
Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2024 12:20:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2982a4f2-ea8f-4fa4-81ea-d73c00fc2ad0@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240628205229.193800-1-Ashish.Kalra@amd.com>
On 28.06.24 22:52, Ashish Kalra wrote:
> From: Ashish Kalra <ashish.kalra@amd.com>
>
> lookup_address_in_pgd_attr() at pte level it is simply returning
> pte_offset_kernel() and there does not seem to be a check for
> returning NULL if pte_none().
>
> Fix lookup_address_in_pgd_attr() to add check for pte_none()
> after pte_offset_kernel() and return NULL if it is true.
Please have a look at the comment above lookup_address(). You should not
break the documented behavior without verifying that no caller is relying
on the current behavior. If this is fine, please update the comment.
Juergen
>
> Signed-off-by: Ashish Kalra <ashish.kalra@amd.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c | 7 ++++++-
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c b/arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c
> index 443a97e515c0..be8b5bf3bc3f 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c
> @@ -672,6 +672,7 @@ pte_t *lookup_address_in_pgd_attr(pgd_t *pgd, unsigned long address,
> p4d_t *p4d;
> pud_t *pud;
> pmd_t *pmd;
> + pte_t *pte;
>
> *level = PG_LEVEL_256T;
> *nx = false;
> @@ -717,7 +718,11 @@ pte_t *lookup_address_in_pgd_attr(pgd_t *pgd, unsigned long address,
> *nx |= pmd_flags(*pmd) & _PAGE_NX;
> *rw &= pmd_flags(*pmd) & _PAGE_RW;
>
> - return pte_offset_kernel(pmd, address);
> + pte = pte_offset_kernel(pmd, address);
> + if (pte_none(*pte))
> + return NULL;
> +
> + return pte;
> }
>
> /*
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-29 10:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-28 20:52 [PATCH] x86/mm: fix lookup_address() to handle physical memory holes in direct mapping Ashish Kalra
2024-06-28 20:58 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2024-06-28 21:22 ` Kalra, Ashish
2024-06-28 21:33 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2024-06-28 21:36 ` Tom Lendacky
2024-06-28 21:31 ` Tom Lendacky
2024-06-29 10:20 ` Jürgen Groß [this message]
2024-06-29 15:16 ` Tom Lendacky
2024-06-29 16:50 ` Jürgen Groß
2024-07-01 17:57 ` Kalra, Ashish
2024-07-01 18:38 ` Jürgen Groß
2024-07-01 18:59 ` Kalra, Ashish
2024-07-01 19:13 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2024-07-01 19:39 ` Kalra, Ashish
2024-07-02 5:29 ` Jürgen Groß
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2982a4f2-ea8f-4fa4-81ea-d73c00fc2ad0@suse.com \
--to=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=Ashish.Kalra@amd.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jroedel@suse.de \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mhklinux@outlook.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox