From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5EE3E60274; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 16:05:05 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.9 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708963507; cv=none; b=eTJGV/3qXzW24C5nzTCxz/X3fQjaAEsO9yP9WSczSg08iat49tJD/QU5WXZ6GHudczCoYS4M2qMlRyAkTEj+LV0EAFczKD8MdjeaQ0jUcD8Pjrfv8bu9yWgjomSQk++IrvGdAYSLmajlxVj3BOyBdg2jUuhYarfuseUZBH4Mkfk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708963507; c=relaxed/simple; bh=WSnrVoHPaDGwsifGqLkbqfrlQFgxZVfaj0VRMWT2aqc=; h=From:Date:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Cn32RM0cmREYkzRhEi9YrR1K6fcLxLsm3MM8rV5sECf45oEU4VVOj0IQrK617K492+EyM6zag8aXprLA+XeUVcZ7k8aEEdFPVoKioHGqGspKOulvrKWV2rwdw1qyggdlza1IG1MyjRxhQr66yaRVJXAZ2zLLVRLCz+1oBtQd4Fs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=IBWeWbLm; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.9 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="IBWeWbLm" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1708963505; x=1740499505; h=from:date:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id: references:mime-version; bh=WSnrVoHPaDGwsifGqLkbqfrlQFgxZVfaj0VRMWT2aqc=; b=IBWeWbLmAcMn3fW3mLJyuto3DRvyN+BD6UrocGgsHcpFC1/DxDoLlGIo VhHOcPIz+YoBwVoJun3xZ853fc4YfRxhOemceIrf6e9h+PnMxH7zsLbOp OruvLVjgfWVVfCEiXMSbcP31MAcntLG6Od8TTlGUSVwWNV8mj1nOMEbNZ qDFjaeXK2ptXl1ffEEywAvCYBpa2wxcdgBZzk9RE93h2615ZRhoyuGHA/ DdS0cksV8KgC/fw7UDba1N6UFs3piBaACwytjwbCuyznbplad18xk7zaO I3p0LPqQnRhbFDNrCuombQuMaTtXEeFzBGSK+R0+o3NorE7DH/ehSS9S2 A==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10996"; a="13962025" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.06,185,1705392000"; d="scan'208";a="13962025" Received: from fmviesa008.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.148]) by fmvoesa103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 26 Feb 2024 08:05:04 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.06,185,1705392000"; d="scan'208";a="6851195" Received: from ijarvine-desk1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.246.48.12]) by fmviesa008-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 26 Feb 2024 08:05:02 -0800 From: =?UTF-8?q?Ilpo=20J=C3=A4rvinen?= Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 18:04:55 +0200 (EET) To: Luiz Capitulino cc: shravankr@nvidia.com, davthompson@nvidia.com, ndalvi@redhat.com, LKML , platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, Hans de Goede Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] platform/mellanox: mlxbf-pmc: Fix module loading In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <29863354-4efe-d199-a9d4-7daf83f6cde9@linux.intel.com> References: <170895404513.2243.14840310263795846559.b4-ty@linux.intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="8323328-81220712-1708963495=:1203" This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --8323328-81220712-1708963495=:1203 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE On Mon, 26 Feb 2024, Luiz Capitulino wrote: > On 2024-02-26 08:27, Ilpo J=C3=A4rvinen wrote: > > On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 15:57:28 -0500, Luiz Capitulino wrote: > >=20 > > > The mlxbf-pmc driver fails to load when the firmware reports a new bu= t not > > > yet implemented performance block. I can reproduce this today with a > > > Bluefield-3 card and UEFI version 4.6.0-18-g7d063bb-BId13035, since t= his > > > reports the new clock_measure performance block. > > >=20 > > > This[1] patch from Shravan implements the clock_measure support and w= ill > > > solve the issue. But this series avoids the situation by ignoring and > > > logging unsupported performance blocks. > > >=20 > > > [...] > >=20 > >=20 > > Thank you for your contribution, it has been applied to my local > > review-ilpo branch. Note it will show up in the public > > platform-drivers-x86/review-ilpo branch only once I've pushed my > > local branch there, which might take a while. >=20 > Thank you Ilpo and thanks Hans for the review. >=20 > The only detail is that we probably want this merged for 6.8 since > the driver doesn't currently load with the configuration mentioned above. Oh, sorry, I missed the mention in the coverletter. So you'd want I drop these from review-ilpo branch as there they end up into for-next branch, and they should go through Hans instead who=20 handles fixes branch for this cycle? --=20 i. --8323328-81220712-1708963495=:1203--