From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66C77C0044D for ; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 07:10:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38E2620679 for ; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 07:10:02 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=mg.codeaurora.org header.i=@mg.codeaurora.org header.b="exWBVc2r" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729881AbgCPHKB (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Mar 2020 03:10:01 -0400 Received: from mail26.static.mailgun.info ([104.130.122.26]:45519 "EHLO mail26.static.mailgun.info" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729788AbgCPHKA (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Mar 2020 03:10:00 -0400 DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; v=1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mg.codeaurora.org; q=dns/txt; s=smtp; t=1584342600; h=Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Subject: Cc: To: From: Date: Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type: MIME-Version: Sender; bh=KJZiL0sdohMQeVpJmkN38lZ6qU33N/oMM0pvgkF9gnc=; b=exWBVc2rvsptixYx81mXjnzIUSsYxXbOki4OtT8fPNSy22G1YZofY058j73321qWtMNYn02s RI1hYFGeUnDkyncpuF01gye5jifXF9LX+/5n3q4vUNSTj4TwgIFkp9Fw+475uRhv0FC1jByR SJJv+Hay2uwIM+yvUjxzXXfUEA4= X-Mailgun-Sending-Ip: 104.130.122.26 X-Mailgun-Sid: WyI0MWYwYSIsICJsaW51eC1rZXJuZWxAdmdlci5rZXJuZWwub3JnIiwgImJlOWU0YSJd Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org (ec2-35-166-182-171.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [35.166.182.171]) by mxa.mailgun.org with ESMTP id 5e6f2647.7fec271ead18-smtp-out-n02; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 07:09:59 -0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 3E808C44792; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 07:09:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.codeaurora.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: cang) by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5390EC433D2; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 07:09:56 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 15:09:56 +0800 From: Can Guo To: Stanley Chu Cc: bvanassche@acm.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, andy.teng@mediatek.com, jejb@linux.ibm.com, chun-hung.wu@mediatek.com, kuohong.wang@mediatek.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, avri.altman@wdc.com, martin.peter~sen@oracle.com, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, peter.wang@mediatek.com, alim.akhtar@samsung.com, matthias.bgg@gmail.com, asutoshd@codeaurora.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, beanhuo@micron.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/8] scsi: ufs: remove init_prefetch_data in struct ufs_hba In-Reply-To: <1584342487.14250.11.camel@mtksdccf07> References: <20200316034218.11914-1-stanley.chu@mediatek.com> <20200316034218.11914-3-stanley.chu@mediatek.com> <51fde835f4f03fcca6e83ba6d3579f2e@codeaurora.org> <1584342487.14250.11.camel@mtksdccf07> Message-ID: <29d75c7ff1a5c7fb54ee145049daa5da@codeaurora.org> X-Sender: cang@codeaurora.org User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.3.9 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Stanley, On 2020-03-16 15:08, Stanley Chu wrote: > Hi Can, > > On Mon, 2020-03-16 at 14:25 +0800, Can Guo wrote: >> On 2020-03-16 11:42, Stanley Chu wrote: >> > Struct init_prefetch_data currently is used privately in >> > ufshcd_init_icc_levels(), thus it can be removed from struct ufs_hba. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Stanley Chu >> > Reviewed-by: Asutosh Das >> > Reviewed-by: Avri Altman >> >> Hi Stanley, >> >> Earlier, I have one similar patch for this, but it does more than >> this. >> Please check the mail I just sent. >> >> Thanks, >> Can Guo. > > OK! Thanks to remind me this. Then I can drop this cleanup patch #2 in > its series to not conflict with your proposed one. > > Thanks, > Stanley Chu Sure, thank you for your quick response. Best regards, Can Guo