From: Viacheslav Dubeyko <vdubeyko@redhat.com>
To: Tristan Madani <tristmd@gmail.com>,
Viacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com>,
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>,
Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org,
Tristan Madani <tristan@talencesecurity.com>,
syzbot+6df204b70bf3261691c5@syzkaller.appspotmail.com,
syzbot+e76bf3d19b85350571ac@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] hfs/hfsplus: fix u32 overflow in check_and_correct_requested_length
Date: Mon, 04 May 2026 16:27:40 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2a12f80d489dbf0a5a128294a95e9181e607a5db.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260501110218.29906-1-tristmd@gmail.com>
On Fri, 2026-05-01 at 11:02 +0000, Tristan Madani wrote:
> From: Tristan Madani <tristan@talencesecurity.com>
>
> check_and_correct_requested_length() compares (off + len) against
> node_size using u32 arithmetic. When the caller passes a large len
> value (e.g. from an underflowed subtraction in hfs_brec_remove()),
> off + len can wrap past 2^32 and produce a small result, causing the
> bounds check to pass when it should fail.
>
> For example, with off=14 and len=0xFFFFFFF2 (underflowed from
> data_off - keyoffset - size in hfs_brec_remove), off + len wraps to 6,
> which is less than a typical node_size of 512, so the check passes and
> the subsequent memmove reads ~4GB past the node buffer.
>
> Fix this by comparing len against (node_size - off) instead. Since
> is_bnode_offset_valid() already guarantees off < node_size before this
> point, the subtraction cannot underflow.
>
> Reported-by: syzbot+6df204b70bf3261691c5@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=6df204b70bf3261691c5
> Tested-by: syzbot+6df204b70bf3261691c5@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Reported-by: syzbot+e76bf3d19b85350571ac@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=e76bf3d19b85350571ac
> Tested-by: syzbot+e76bf3d19b85350571ac@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Fixes: a431930c9bac ("hfs: fix slab-out-of-bounds in hfs_bnode_read()")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Tristan Madani <tristan@talencesecurity.com>
> ---
> fs/hfs/bnode.c | 2 +-
> fs/hfsplus/hfsplus_fs.h | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/hfs/bnode.c b/fs/hfs/bnode.c
> index 13d58c51fc46b..c00645a4a5733 100644
> --- a/fs/hfs/bnode.c
> +++ b/fs/hfs/bnode.c
> @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ u32 check_and_correct_requested_length(struct hfs_bnode *node, u32 off, u32 len)
>
> node_size = node->tree->node_size;
>
> - if ((off + len) > node_size) {
> + if (len > node_size - off) {
I don't agree with likewise change. Probably, we need to have:
(u64)off + len
Thanks,
Slava.
> u32 new_len = node_size - off;
>
> pr_err("requested length has been corrected: "
> diff --git a/fs/hfsplus/hfsplus_fs.h b/fs/hfsplus/hfsplus_fs.h
> index 3545b8dbf11c5..10b2dda3f8044 100644
> --- a/fs/hfsplus/hfsplus_fs.h
> +++ b/fs/hfsplus/hfsplus_fs.h
> @@ -600,7 +600,7 @@ u32 check_and_correct_requested_length(struct hfs_bnode *node, u32 off, u32 len)
>
> node_size = node->tree->node_size;
>
> - if ((off + len) > node_size) {
> + if (len > node_size - off) {
> u32 new_len = node_size - off;
>
> pr_err("requested length has been corrected: "
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-04 23:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-01 11:02 [PATCH 1/3] hfs/hfsplus: fix u32 overflow in check_and_correct_requested_length Tristan Madani
2026-05-01 11:02 ` [PATCH 2/3] hfs/hfsplus: initialize data buffer in hfs_bnode_read_u16 and hfs_bnode_read_u8 Tristan Madani
2026-05-04 23:29 ` Viacheslav Dubeyko
2026-05-01 11:02 ` [PATCH 3/3] hfsplus: fix null pointer dereference in hfsplus_create_attributes_file Tristan Madani
2026-05-04 23:31 ` Viacheslav Dubeyko
2026-05-04 23:27 ` Viacheslav Dubeyko [this message]
2026-05-05 11:12 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] hfs/hfsplus: fix OOB access and uninit-value in bnode operations Tristan Madani
2026-05-05 11:12 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] hfs/hfsplus: fix u32 overflow in check_and_correct_requested_length Tristan Madani
2026-05-05 11:12 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] hfs/hfsplus: zero-initialize buffer in hfs_bnode_read Tristan Madani
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2a12f80d489dbf0a5a128294a95e9181e607a5db.camel@redhat.com \
--to=vdubeyko@redhat.com \
--cc=frank.li@vivo.com \
--cc=glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=slava@dubeyko.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=syzbot+6df204b70bf3261691c5@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=syzbot+e76bf3d19b85350571ac@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=tristan@talencesecurity.com \
--cc=tristmd@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox