From: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
To: Itaru Kitayama <itaru.kitayama@linux.dev>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Donald Dutile <ddutile@redhat.com>,
Eric Chanudet <echanude@redhat.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] Speed up boot with faster linear map creation
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 11:10:26 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2a19f555-56db-403f-a774-65a1e9381a78@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZgP9zfHz2NfiQqSZ@vm3>
On 27/03/2024 11:06, Itaru Kitayama wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 10:14:45AM +0000, Ryan Roberts wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> It turns out that creating the linear map can take a significant proportion of
>> the total boot time, especially when rodata=full. And a large portion of the
>> time it takes to create the linear map is issuing TLBIs. This series reworks the
>> kernel pgtable generation code to significantly reduce the number of TLBIs. See
>> each patch for details.
>>
>> The below shows the execution time of map_mem() across a couple of different
>> systems with different RAM configurations. We measure after applying each patch
>> and show the improvement relative to base (v6.9-rc1):
>>
>> | Apple M2 VM | Ampere Altra| Ampere Altra| Ampere Altra
>> | VM, 16G | VM, 64G | VM, 256G | Metal, 512G
>> ---------------|-------------|-------------|-------------|-------------
>> | ms (%) | ms (%) | ms (%) | ms (%)
>> ---------------|-------------|-------------|-------------|-------------
>> base | 151 (0%) | 2191 (0%) | 8990 (0%) | 17443 (0%)
>> no-cont-remap | 77 (-49%) | 429 (-80%) | 1753 (-80%) | 3796 (-78%)
>> no-alloc-remap | 77 (-49%) | 375 (-83%) | 1532 (-83%) | 3366 (-81%)
>> lazy-unmap | 63 (-58%) | 330 (-85%) | 1312 (-85%) | 2929 (-83%)
>>
>> This series applies on top of v6.9-rc1. All mm selftests pass. I haven't yet
>> tested all VA size configs (although I don't anticipate any issues); I'll do
>> this as part of followup.
>
> The series was applied cleanly on top of v6.9-rc1+ of Linus's master
> branch, and boots fine on M1 VM with 14GB of memory.
>
> Just out of curiosity, how did you measure the boot time and obtain the
> breakdown of the execution times of each phase?
diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
index 495b732d5af3..8a9d47115784 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
@@ -792,7 +792,14 @@ static void __init create_idmap(void)
void __init paging_init(void)
{
+ u64 start, end;
+
+ start = __arch_counter_get_cntvct();
map_mem(swapper_pg_dir);
+ end = __arch_counter_get_cntvct();
+
+ pr_err("map_mem: time=%llu us\n",
+ ((end - start) * 1000000) / arch_timer_get_cntfrq());
memblock_allow_resize();
>
> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <itaru.kitayama@fujitsu.com>
Thanks!
>
> Thanks,
> Itaru.
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Ryan
>>
>>
>> Ryan Roberts (3):
>> arm64: mm: Don't remap pgtables per- cont(pte|pmd) block
>> arm64: mm: Don't remap pgtables for allocate vs populate
>> arm64: mm: Lazily clear pte table mappings from fixmap
>>
>> arch/arm64/include/asm/fixmap.h | 5 +-
>> arch/arm64/include/asm/mmu.h | 8 +
>> arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h | 4 -
>> arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 10 +-
>> arch/arm64/mm/fixmap.c | 11 +
>> arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c | 364 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>> include/linux/pgtable.h | 8 +
>> 7 files changed, 307 insertions(+), 103 deletions(-)
>>
>> --
>> 2.25.1
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-27 11:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-26 10:14 [PATCH v1 0/3] Speed up boot with faster linear map creation Ryan Roberts
2024-03-26 10:14 ` [PATCH v1 1/3] arm64: mm: Don't remap pgtables per- cont(pte|pmd) block Ryan Roberts
2024-03-26 10:14 ` [PATCH v1 2/3] arm64: mm: Don't remap pgtables for allocate vs populate Ryan Roberts
2024-03-27 2:05 ` kernel test robot
2024-03-26 10:14 ` [PATCH v1 3/3] arm64: mm: Lazily clear pte table mappings from fixmap Ryan Roberts
2024-03-27 10:09 ` [PATCH v1 0/3] Speed up boot with faster linear map creation Ard Biesheuvel
2024-03-27 10:43 ` Ryan Roberts
2024-03-27 13:36 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2024-03-27 15:01 ` Ryan Roberts
2024-03-27 15:57 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2024-03-27 16:11 ` Ryan Roberts
2024-03-27 11:06 ` Itaru Kitayama
2024-03-27 11:10 ` Ryan Roberts [this message]
2024-03-27 19:07 ` [PATCH v1] arm64: mm: Batch dsb and isb when populating pgtables Ryan Roberts
2024-03-28 7:23 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2024-03-28 8:45 ` Ryan Roberts
2024-03-28 8:56 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2024-03-27 19:12 ` [PATCH v1 0/3] Speed up boot with faster linear map creation Ryan Roberts
2024-03-28 23:08 ` Eric Chanudet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2a19f555-56db-403f-a774-65a1e9381a78@arm.com \
--to=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=ddutile@redhat.com \
--cc=echanude@redhat.com \
--cc=itaru.kitayama@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox