From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11AE9C4167B for ; Thu, 15 Dec 2022 15:14:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229728AbiLOPOT (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Dec 2022 10:14:19 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:42844 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229928AbiLOPNo (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Dec 2022 10:13:44 -0500 Received: from mail-il1-x12d.google.com (mail-il1-x12d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12d]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D81823134C for ; Thu, 15 Dec 2022 07:13:01 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-il1-x12d.google.com with SMTP id z9so8317982ilu.10 for ; Thu, 15 Dec 2022 07:13:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel-dk.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Ettxvkoo48TgHt23PLScA7ThZLMXBN9lSxI8bDks3GA=; b=CulseMnsxDDcu8UWrwKdLaRzFiQJFVqNRgNAVYLhYWUp7xvEt1TgkJ4h8loklcSQTM 40S36jyd6ZZrNueS7BOXSe3V3xYQtHbCCtlkuEwCiy3DWvcYPcbQ1uEyBTzsF3Bw6vWJ h6MrvpEetQT+I9d/6opAFfslyfGAO1egF5f1mNaAC+zoELw3bZYu5HgM814i8X3K4IKK hQgmDjFFN9+oGQO5asivEqFqvGX+7dRlVcp3W553xizk7fHddDOZajEIo8KTydVO4hHH HNYF2fzXmnnMFhOtdthDyClZCA/+C3ujsQMmsScQvbMNRUIdfU0crH8atjRmAxQcvhqL +bFg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Ettxvkoo48TgHt23PLScA7ThZLMXBN9lSxI8bDks3GA=; b=edfkYYuZtqr3hCvk3m9YMyKQM4NLP543bWtN3rkqnvzNr9aCb0sKKCBqHUJMLKS65m Ltfo2gO91WU+9VitKls56YeG0+/yO6gedw4UuFVr/hS0SGOFVtE1U552kU5JdTJsC5OF 2ryhQMpfEBCe1R0XRxNZb28ObWoJbKStexlRrtB/Yuz5T8OT325pxYn4x0AfUHtsU7qq lKg0+/ump9TL7XAlc7OaB7EJdWasVSbMQ7B0uRRMJ4pIZmAg9LQ5EJPmKY0Qyj0xuyNf ASnU46xvt2XMBbU4pOQdzYZ1fMt+o0tNEWxhUH2iI+FcsgTKJTe+6VjlOxZstczV8PCY cbKg== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pmDf1Fwdgv10FfOY+MMlHKH4OJD0fFILs6KL5jWfYJxnbSOMZnL 08scs28slcJTWlP6QQHpaJk9KA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf7t5P4vPE4+oG1T9TGNc1CuX5DMzYvNEzYOz7NFAqNIUQPsrFjObobrYq6/3fi2KebfEyP9mA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:ed0:b0:304:ac4f:a79b with SMTP id i16-20020a056e020ed000b00304ac4fa79bmr2343674ilk.3.1671117180838; Thu, 15 Dec 2022 07:13:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.94] ([207.135.234.126]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id bv23-20020a056638449700b0038a6d03db70sm2612714jab.34.2022.12.15.07.12.59 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 15 Dec 2022 07:13:00 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2a413c11-5e5f-7aa2-4734-78cabf393ba2@kernel.dk> Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2022 08:12:59 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux aarch64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.5.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH V10 0/8] block, bfq: extend bfq to support multi-actuator drives Content-Language: en-US To: Paolo Valente Cc: Arie van der Hoeven , linux-block , linux-kernel , Rory Chen , Glen Valante , Damien Le Moal References: <20221209094442.36896-1-paolo.valente@linaro.org> <0bcf7776-59d7-53ef-bfd0-449940a05161@kernel.dk> <7125ff61-bf11-6f8c-8496-f2603371c214@kernel.dk> <3479E7A6-8CAD-4A32-A0BB-00A851883EA7@linaro.org> From: Jens Axboe In-Reply-To: <3479E7A6-8CAD-4A32-A0BB-00A851883EA7@linaro.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 12/15/22 8:04 AM, Paolo Valente wrote: > > >> Il giorno 13 dic 2022, alle ore 18:17, Jens Axboe ha scritto: >> >> Please don't top post... >> >> On 12/13/22 10:10?AM, Arie van der Hoeven wrote: >>> We understand being conservative but the code paths only impact on a >>> product that is not yet in market. This is version 10 spanning months >>> with many gaps waiting on review. It's an interesting case study. >> >> That's a nice theory, but that's not how code works. As mentioned, the >> last version was posted 1-2 weeks later than would've been appropriate >> for inclusion. >> > > So, what's the plan? Looks like 1/8 and 8/8 still need Damien to review it, then queue up for 6.3 when ready. Not sure why this is even a question, it just means that inclusion is pushed a release out as it missed the current merge window. -- Jens Axboe