public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eli Billauer <eli.billauer@gmail.com>
To: Hyunwoo Kim <imv4bel@gmail.com>
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, arnd@arndb.de,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
	stern@rowland.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] char: xillybus: Prevent use-after-free due to race condition
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2022 10:30:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2a8f59ac-9d49-ffa3-b035-809f2fac38ec@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221113080558.GA5854@ubuntu>

On 13/11/2022 10:05, Hyunwoo Kim wrote:
> Dear,
> 
> Sorry for the late review.
> 
> This patch cannot prevent the UAF scenario I presented:
> ```
>                  cpu0                                                cpu1
>         1. xillyusb_open()
>            mutex_lock(&kref_mutex);    // unaffected lock
>            xillybus_find_inode()
>            mutex_lock(&unit_mutex);
>            unit = iter;
>            mutex_unlock(&unit_mutex);
>                                                               2. xillyusb_disconnect()
>                                                                  xillybus_cleanup_chrdev()
>                                                                  mutex_lock(&unit_mutex);
>                                                                  kfree(unit);
>                                                                  mutex_unlock(&unit_mutex);
>         3. *private_data = unit->private_data;   // UAF
> 
> ```
> 
> This is a UAF for 'unit', not a UAF for 'xdev'.
> So, the added 'kref_mutex' has no effect.
> 

You're correct. This submitted patch solves only one problem out of two. 
It prevents the content of @private_data to be freed, but you're right 
that @unit itself isn't protected well enough.

The problem you're pointing at is that @unit can be freed before its 
attempted use, because the mutex is released too early.

This is easily solved by moving down the mutex_unlock() call to after 
@unit has been used. Do you want the pleasure to submit this patch, or 
should I?

Thanks,
   Eli

  reply	other threads:[~2022-11-13  8:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-30  9:42 [PATCH v2] char: xillybus: Prevent use-after-free due to race condition Eli Billauer
2022-10-30 16:23 ` Alan Stern
2022-10-30 18:55   ` Eli Billauer
2022-11-13  8:05 ` Hyunwoo Kim
2022-11-13  8:30   ` Eli Billauer [this message]
2022-11-13  8:47     ` Hyunwoo Kim
2022-11-13  9:03       ` Eli Billauer
2022-11-13  9:14         ` Hyunwoo Kim
2022-11-13 11:36           ` Eli Billauer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2a8f59ac-9d49-ffa3-b035-809f2fac38ec@gmail.com \
    --to=eli.billauer@gmail.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=imv4bel@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox