From: Matthieu Baerts <matttbe@kernel.org>
To: kuniyu@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com
Cc: syzbot <syzbot+ff020673c5e3d94d9478@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mptcp@lists.linux.dev,
syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [syzbot] [mptcp?] KMSAN: uninit-value in mptcp_established_options
Date: Thu, 7 May 2026 09:44:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2a9bde65-d2de-44cc-9192-e7aa8a0935a7@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <69f8e352.170a0220.bb392.0005.GAE@google.com>
Hi Paolo, Kuniyuki,
On 04/05/2026 20:20, syzbot wrote:
> Hello,
>
> syzbot has tested the proposed patch but the reproducer is still triggering an issue:
> KMSAN: uninit-value in irqentry_exit_to_kernel_mode_preempt
It looks like the issue is different now:
> =====================================================
> BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in irqentry_exit_to_kernel_mode_preempt+0xb0/0xc0 include/linux/irq-entry-common.h:472
> irqentry_exit_to_kernel_mode_preempt+0xb0/0xc0 include/linux/irq-entry-common.h:472
> irqentry_exit_to_kernel_mode include/linux/irq-entry-common.h:547 [inline]
> irqentry_exit+0x7b/0x760 kernel/entry/common.c:164
> sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x52/0x90 arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1061
> asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/include/asm/idtentry.h:697
> kmsan_get_metadata+0x17/0x160 mm/kmsan/shadow.c:125
> kmsan_get_shadow_origin_ptr+0x4a/0xb0 mm/kmsan/shadow.c:102
> get_shadow_origin_ptr mm/kmsan/instrumentation.c:38 [inline]
> __msan_metadata_ptr_for_load_4+0x24/0x40 mm/kmsan/instrumentation.c:93
> tcp_data_queue+0xdc/0x7c90 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:5589
> tcp_rcv_established+0x19bb/0x3200 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:6656
> tcp_v4_do_rcv+0xc4b/0x1b10 net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c:1852
> sk_backlog_rcv include/net/sock.h:1190 [inline]
That's the input side.
> __release_sock+0x360/0x7d0 net/core/sock.c:3216
> release_sock+0x22d/0x300 net/core/sock.c:3815
> mptcp_subflow_shutdown+0x358/0x690 net/mptcp/protocol.c:3144
> mptcp_check_send_data_fin+0x31b/0x3d0 net/mptcp/protocol.c:3218
> __mptcp_wr_shutdown net/mptcp/protocol.c:3234 [inline]
> __mptcp_close+0x860/0x1360 net/mptcp/protocol.c:3313
> mptcp_close+0x42/0x260 net/mptcp/protocol.c:3367
> inet_release+0x1ee/0x2a0 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:442
> __sock_release net/socket.c:722 [inline]
> sock_close+0xd6/0x2f0 net/socket.c:1514
> __fput+0x60e/0x1010 fs/file_table.c:510
> ____fput+0x25/0x30 fs/file_table.c:538
> task_work_run+0x208/0x2b0 kernel/task_work.c:233
> resume_user_mode_work include/linux/resume_user_mode.h:50 [inline]
> __exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:67 [inline]
> exit_to_user_mode_loop+0x306/0x1b60 kernel/entry/common.c:98
> __exit_to_user_mode_prepare include/linux/irq-entry-common.h:207 [inline]
> syscall_exit_to_user_mode_prepare include/linux/irq-entry-common.h:238 [inline]
> syscall_exit_to_user_mode include/linux/entry-common.h:318 [inline]
> do_syscall_64+0x236/0xf80 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:100
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
>
> Local variable mp_opt created at:
> mptcp_incoming_options+0x11d/0x43b0 net/mptcp/options.c:1171
Confirmed here. With "struct mptcp_options_received" while the original
issue was with "struct mptcp_out_options".
Plus I'm not exactly sure to understand the issue here: mp_opt is
defined and used only in mptcp_incoming_options(), and I don't see
anything using it after the end of this function. Or did I miss something?
Cheers,
Matt
--
Sponsored by the NGI0 Core fund.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-07 7:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <69f44505.050a0220.3cbe47.0008.GAE@google.com>
[not found] ` <20260504095101.852039-2-matttbe@kernel.org>
[not found] ` <67030b5e-0435-49fc-8adb-8dd8536ad853@kernel.org>
2026-05-04 16:22 ` [PATCH] mptcp: fix KMSAN: uninit-value in mptcp_established_options Paolo Abeni
2026-05-04 17:14 ` [syzbot] [mptcp?] " syzbot
2026-05-04 17:31 ` [PATCH] mptcp: fix " Paolo Abeni
2026-05-04 18:20 ` [syzbot] [mptcp?] " syzbot
2026-05-07 7:44 ` Matthieu Baerts [this message]
2026-05-08 9:27 ` Paolo Abeni
2026-05-08 10:11 ` Alexander Potapenko
2026-05-08 10:46 ` Matthieu Baerts
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2a9bde65-d2de-44cc-9192-e7aa8a0935a7@kernel.org \
--to=matttbe@kernel.org \
--cc=kuniyu@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mptcp@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=syzbot+ff020673c5e3d94d9478@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox