From: Mukesh Ojha <mojha@codeaurora.org>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: of: Optimize quirk checks
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2019 15:32:20 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2aa29620-13c9-e618-93e9-dedc464cfa74@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190329084229.17018-1-geert+renesas@glider.be>
On 3/29/2019 2:12 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Simple string comparisons are cheaper than DT lookups, as the latter
> involve taking a spinlock and traversing properties.
> Hence optimize quirk checks by postponing DT lookups after string
> comparisons.
>
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Mukesh Ojha <mojha@codeaurora.org>
Cheers,
-Mukesh
> ---
> drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c | 11 +++++------
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c
> index 6a3ec575a404ed9f..3a6bb53d89dfed32 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c
> @@ -86,9 +86,9 @@ static void of_gpio_flags_quirks(struct device_node *np,
> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_REGULATOR) &&
> (of_device_is_compatible(np, "regulator-fixed") ||
> of_device_is_compatible(np, "reg-fixed-voltage") ||
> - (of_device_is_compatible(np, "regulator-gpio") &&
> - !(strcmp(propname, "enable-gpio") &&
> - strcmp(propname, "enable-gpios"))))) {
> + (!(strcmp(propname, "enable-gpio") &&
> + strcmp(propname, "enable-gpios")) &&
> + of_device_is_compatible(np, "regulator-gpio")))) {
> /*
> * The regulator GPIO handles are specified such that the
> * presence or absence of "enable-active-high" solely controls
> @@ -119,9 +119,8 @@ static void of_gpio_flags_quirks(struct device_node *np,
> * property named "cs-gpios" we need to inspect the child node
> * to determine if the flags should have inverted semantics.
> */
> - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SPI_MASTER) &&
> - of_property_read_bool(np, "cs-gpios") &&
> - !strcmp(propname, "cs-gpios")) {
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SPI_MASTER) && !strcmp(propname, "cs-gpios") &&
> + of_property_read_bool(np, "cs-gpios")) {
> struct device_node *child;
> u32 cs;
> int ret;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-29 10:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-29 8:42 [PATCH] gpio: of: Optimize quirk checks Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-03-29 10:02 ` Mukesh Ojha [this message]
2019-04-08 11:04 ` Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2aa29620-13c9-e618-93e9-dedc464cfa74@codeaurora.org \
--to=mojha@codeaurora.org \
--cc=bgolaszewski@baylibre.com \
--cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox