public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb+git@google.com>, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] x86/efistub: Obtain SEV CC blob address from the stub
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2025 16:27:27 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2abffe1f-e289-4261-97f0-cfc4cf674fd0@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250909080631.2867579-7-ardb+git@google.com>

On 9/9/25 03:06, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
> 
> The x86 EFI stub no longer boots the core kernel via the traditional
> decompressor but jumps straight to it, avoiding all the page fault
> handling and other complexity that is entirely unnecessary when booting
> via EFI, which guarantees that all system memory is mapped 1:1.
> 
> The SEV startup code in the core kernel expects the address of the CC
> blob configuration table in boot_params, so store it there when booting
> from EFI with SEV-SNP enabled. This removes the need to call
> sev_enable() from the EFI stub.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
> ---
>  drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/x86-stub.c | 21 +++++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/x86-stub.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/x86-stub.c
> index 0d05eac7c72b..c4ef645762ec 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/x86-stub.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/x86-stub.c
> @@ -681,17 +681,28 @@ static efi_status_t exit_boot(struct boot_params *boot_params, void *handle)
>  	return EFI_SUCCESS;
>  }
>  
> -static bool have_unsupported_snp_features(void)
> +static bool check_snp_features(struct boot_params *bp)
>  {
> +	u64 status = sev_get_status();
>  	u64 unsupported;
>  
> -	unsupported = snp_get_unsupported_features(sev_get_status());
> +	unsupported = snp_get_unsupported_features(status);
>  	if (unsupported) {
>  		efi_err("Unsupported SEV-SNP features detected: 0x%llx\n",
>  			unsupported);
> -		return true;
> +		return false;
>  	}
> -	return false;
> +
> +	if (status & MSR_AMD64_SEV_SNP_ENABLED) {
> +		void *tbl = get_efi_config_table(EFI_CC_BLOB_GUID);
> +
> +		if (!tbl) {
> +			efi_err("SEV-SNP is enabled but CC blob not found\n");
> +			return false;
> +		}
> +		bp->cc_blob_address = (u32)(unsigned long)tbl;

I think we ran into bugs where the cc_blob_address was random data from a
boot loader when SNP wasn't active and that's why we always initialize it
to 0:

4b1c74240757 ("x86/boot: Don't propagate uninitialized boot_params->cc_blob_address")

So we probably need the same statement that is at the beginning of the
decompressor sev_enable() at the very beginning of this function to ensure
cc_blob_address is set to zero:

	/*    
	 * bp->cc_blob_address should only be set by boot/compressed kernel.
	 * Initialize it to 0 to ensure that uninitialized values from
	 * buggy bootloaders aren't propagated.
	 */
	if (bp)
		bp->cc_blob_address = 0;

Thanks,
Tom

> +	}
> +	return true;
>  }
>  
>  static void efi_get_seed(void *seed, int size)
> @@ -831,7 +842,7 @@ void __noreturn efi_stub_entry(efi_handle_t handle,
>  
>  	hdr = &boot_params->hdr;
>  
> -	if (have_unsupported_snp_features())
> +	if (!check_snp_features(boot_params))
>  		efi_exit(handle, EFI_UNSUPPORTED);
>  
>  	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_EFI_DXE_MEM_ATTRIBUTES)) {


  reply	other threads:[~2025-09-11 21:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-09  8:06 [PATCH v4 0/3] efi: Don't initalize SEV-SNP from the EFI stub Ard Biesheuvel
2025-09-09  8:06 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] x86/boot: Drop unused sev_enable() fallback Ard Biesheuvel
2025-09-11 21:35   ` Tom Lendacky
2025-11-20 20:26   ` [tip: x86/sev] " tip-bot2 for Ard Biesheuvel
2025-09-09  8:06 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] x86/efistub: Obtain SEV CC blob address from the stub Ard Biesheuvel
2025-09-11 21:27   ` Tom Lendacky [this message]
2025-09-11 21:49     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-09-09  8:06 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] x86/efistub: Don't bother enabling SEV in the EFI stub Ard Biesheuvel
2025-09-11 21:53   ` Tom Lendacky
2025-09-12  7:29     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-09-12  8:26       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-09-12 13:32         ` Tom Lendacky
2025-09-15 16:08           ` Borislav Petkov
2025-09-12 20:34 ` Ashish Kalra
2025-09-12 22:22   ` Ard Biesheuvel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2abffe1f-e289-4261-97f0-cfc4cf674fd0@amd.com \
    --to=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=ardb+git@google.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox