Re: [RFC PATCH net-next] net/smc: Introduce SMC-related proc files

[Wenjia Zhang <wenjia@linux.ibm.com>]

On 11.09.23 09:20, Wen Gu wrote:
> This patch introduces /proc/net/smc4 and /proc/net/smc6 files to report
> statistic information of SMC connections.
> 
> Compared with 'smcss' command in smc-tools, getting SMC connections via
> proc files is not efficient. However, in some container scenarios, some
> dependencies are lacked for compiling and using smc-tools. In this case,
> using proc files to check SMC connections becomes a simple and fast way.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wen Gu <guwen@linux.alibaba.com>
> ---
>   include/net/smc.h  |   5 +-
>   net/smc/Makefile   |   2 +-
>   net/smc/af_smc.c   |  22 ++++-
>   net/smc/smc_diag.c |  29 +++---
>   net/smc/smc_proc.c | 283 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   net/smc/smc_proc.h |  35 +++++++
>   6 files changed, 355 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>   create mode 100644 net/smc/smc_proc.c
>   create mode 100644 net/smc/smc_proc.h
> 

Hi Wen,

I can understand your problem and frustration. However, there are two 
reasons I'm not really convinced by the proc file method:
1) AFAI, the proc method could consume many CPU time especially in case 
with a log of sockets to read the pseudo files.
2) We have already implemented the complex netlink method on the same 
purpose. I see the double expense to main the code.

Then the question is if the lack of dependency issue can be handle 
somehow, or the proc method is the only way to achieve this purpose?

Any opinion is welcome!

Thanks,
Wenjia