The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Usama Arif <usama.arif@linux.dev>
To: Joshua Hahn <joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	apopple@nvidia.com, baohua@kernel.org,
	baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com, byungchul@sk.com,
	david@kernel.org, dev.jain@arm.com, gourry@gourry.net,
	jannh@google.com, lance.yang@linux.dev, liam@infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, ljs@kernel.org,
	matthew.brost@intel.com, npache@redhat.com, rakie.kim@sk.com,
	ryan.roberts@arm.com, vbabka@kernel.org,
	ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com, ziy@nvidia.com,
	shakeel.butt@linux.dev, hannes@cmpxchg.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] mm: handle device-private PMDs in walk callbacks
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2026 13:22:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2b316dd0-c6dc-4b9c-9de3-deeb1f481132@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260707191917.3213033-1-joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com>



On 07/07/2026 20:19, Joshua Hahn wrote:
> On Tue,  7 Jul 2026 06:45:06 -0700 Usama Arif <usama.arif@linux.dev> wrote:
> 
>> Since commit 368076f52ebe ("mm/huge_memory: add device-private THP support
>> to PMD operations") a PMD may hold a device-private swap entry whenever
>> an HMM-based GPU driver migrates an anonymous THP folio to device memory
>> via migrate_vma_pages().
>>
>> pmd_trans_huge_lock() succeeds for such PMDs (pmd_is_huge() returns true
>> for any non-present, non-none huge PMD), so several MM walk callbacks
>> that used to assume present THP or migration entry are now reachable with
>> a device-private PMD. The results range from a VM_BUG_ON() firing on debug
>> kernels, to an oops on a bogus vmemmap dereference, to silently isolating
>> an unrelated live folio from LRU in the aliasing case.
>>
>> The first 2 fixes were reported as pre-existing issues by sashiko in my
>> PMD swap entry series [1]. Hopefully sashiko won't point these out
>> in the next PMD swap entry series :)
> 
> Hello Usama,
> 
> Thank you for the fixes! I think all of them look good and they are fixes
> so please feel free to add my
> 
> Reviewed-by: Joshua Hahn <joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com>
> 
> One thing I wanted to maybe consider is for 1/3, whether it could be
> good to gate by !pmd_present() like the sites in 2/3 and 3/3, maybe
> that will be more robust in the future if there are other cases we
> should protect against (and the same as queue_folios_pte_range, which
> uses the !pte_present() check too).
> 
> For 2/3 and 3/3 we already have the !pmd_present() check, would it be
> worth considering just changing the VM_BUG_ON condition to include
> !pmd_is_device_private_entry()?
> 
> Just wanted to toss my 2c. Thanks again for the fixes Usama!
> Joshua
> 
Thanks for the reviews Joshua, I think they all made sense.
I have sent v2 [1] following your suggestions.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260708122040.861335-1-usama.arif@linux.dev/


      reply	other threads:[~2026-07-08 12:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-07 13:45 [PATCH 0/3] mm: handle device-private PMDs in walk callbacks Usama Arif
2026-07-07 13:45 ` [PATCH 1/3] mm/mempolicy: skip device-private PMDs when queueing folios Usama Arif
2026-07-07 20:33   ` Zi Yan
2026-07-08 10:54     ` Usama Arif
2026-07-08 15:25       ` Zi Yan
2026-07-07 23:49   ` Balbir Singh
2026-07-07 13:45 ` [PATCH 2/3] mm/madvise: skip device-private PMDs in cold and pageout walks Usama Arif
2026-07-07 20:41   ` Zi Yan
2026-07-07 23:27   ` Balbir Singh
2026-07-07 13:45 ` [PATCH 3/3] mm/huge_memory: skip device-private PMDs in madvise_free_huge_pmd Usama Arif
2026-07-07 20:44   ` Zi Yan
2026-07-07 23:26   ` Balbir Singh
2026-07-07 14:01 ` [PATCH 0/3] mm: handle device-private PMDs in walk callbacks Lorenzo Stoakes
2026-07-07 14:12   ` Usama Arif
2026-07-08  8:23     ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2026-07-08  8:40       ` Balbir Singh
2026-07-07 15:30   ` Zi Yan
2026-07-07 22:57   ` Balbir Singh
2026-07-08  8:38     ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2026-07-07 19:19 ` Joshua Hahn
2026-07-08 12:22   ` Usama Arif [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2b316dd0-c6dc-4b9c-9de3-deeb1f481132@linux.dev \
    --to=usama.arif@linux.dev \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
    --cc=baohua@kernel.org \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=byungchul@sk.com \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
    --cc=gourry@gourry.net \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com \
    --cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
    --cc=liam@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=ljs@kernel.org \
    --cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --cc=npache@redhat.com \
    --cc=rakie.kim@sk.com \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    --cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
    --cc=ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox