From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: "Daniel Walker (danielwa)" <danielwa@cisco.com>,
Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>
Cc: "Andy Shevchenko" <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
"Ilpo J�rvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>,
"Klara Modin" <klarasmodin@gmail.com>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Danil Rybakov" <danilrybakov249@gmail.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"xe-linux-external(mailer list)" <xe-linux-external@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: platform/x86: p2sb: Allow p2sb_bar() calls during PCI device probe
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2024 18:04:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2c828592-dbdd-4cd4-b366-70797d63329d@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <82ab3d06-40e6-41dd-bb43-9179d4497313@redhat.com>
Hi,
On 13-Nov-24 5:33 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 13-Nov-24 5:24 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 13-Nov-24 4:42 PM, Daniel Walker (danielwa) wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I bisected an issue of a missing pci device to commit 2841631 the commit title
>>> in the subject line which was included in v6.1 stable branch.
>>>
>>> There was a later fix for a similar missing pci device commit 36c676e2 which
>>> appears to be for Goldmont/Apollo Lake. The hardware I'm using is
>>> Goldmont/Denverton. This fix did not appear to change the behavior I'm seeing.
>>>
>>> The pci device which is disappearing is a custom gpio device.
>>>
>>> I tested v6.12-rc5-next to see if any other changes had fixed the issue, but there was
>>> no change in behavior since commit 2841631 .
>>>
>>> When booting up the device is shown in the pci boot messages but the device
>>> doesn't end up making it to lspci once you get to a prompt.
>>
>> Please give the attached patch a try, this will hopefully fix things.
>>
>> Once I have confirmation that this fixes things I'll post it to the list.
>>
>> Note this will not backport to the 6.1 stable branch cleanly due to
>> changes in the x86_cpu_id macros in mainline. Backporting it should
>> be trivial. Please send a backport to stable@vger.kernel.org yourself
>> once this has been merged upstream.
>>
>> If you backport this, please also backport 36c676e2 first.
>
> Never mind, self nack. This is correct for Gemini Lake which
> has its SPI at device.function 13.2 like Apollo Lake.
>
> But looking at the dmesg Denverton actually has it at 1f.1
> aka 31.1 like most other Intel SoCs.
>
> Which make me wonder why this does not work on Denverton.
>
> It probably has something to do with these 2 messages:
>
> pci 0000:00:1f.1: BAR 0 [mem 0xfd000000-0xfdffffff 64bit]: can't claim; no compatible bridge window
> pci 0000:00:1f.1: BAR 0 [mem 0x280000000-0x280ffffff 64bit]: assigned
>
> I'm guessing that this re-assignment is messing up
> the p2sb BAR caching, after which things go wrong.
Hmm, but that should be fixed by 2c6370e66076 ("platform/x86: p2sb: Don't init until unassigned resources have been assigned")
and you are seeing this with 6.12, which has that.
Can you try adding a pr_info() to the top of p2sb_cache_resources()
with 6.12 and then collec a new dmesg ?
If that pr_info() is done after the:
pci 0000:00:1f.1: BAR 0 [mem 0x280000000-0x280ffffff 64bit]: assigned
message then that does not explain things.
Regards,
Hans
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-13 17:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-13 15:42 platform/x86: p2sb: Allow p2sb_bar() calls during PCI device probe Daniel Walker (danielwa)
2024-11-13 16:24 ` Hans de Goede
2024-11-13 16:33 ` Hans de Goede
2024-11-13 16:38 ` Hans de Goede
2024-11-13 17:19 ` Daniel Walker (danielwa)
2024-11-13 17:04 ` Hans de Goede [this message]
2024-11-13 17:41 ` Daniel Walker (danielwa)
2024-11-13 18:34 ` Hans de Goede
2024-11-15 11:35 ` Shinichiro Kawasaki
2024-11-15 14:57 ` Daniel Walker (danielwa)
2024-11-18 11:30 ` Shinichiro Kawasaki
2024-11-18 11:42 ` Hans de Goede
2024-11-18 12:14 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-11-18 12:40 ` Daniel Walker (danielwa)
2024-11-18 13:24 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-11-18 13:29 ` Hans de Goede
2024-11-18 13:52 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-11-18 13:32 ` Daniel Walker (danielwa)
2024-11-18 13:49 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-11-18 14:35 ` Daniel Walker (danielwa)
2024-11-18 15:55 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-11-18 16:00 ` Hans de Goede
2024-11-18 16:08 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-11-18 17:15 ` Daniel Walker (danielwa)
2024-11-19 2:20 ` Shinichiro Kawasaki
2024-11-19 9:37 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-11-20 4:03 ` Shinichiro Kawasaki
2024-11-19 18:28 ` Hans de Goede
2024-11-19 20:51 ` Daniel Walker (danielwa)
2024-11-20 7:06 ` Shinichiro Kawasaki
2024-11-19 9:41 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-11-19 14:47 ` Daniel Walker (danielwa)
2024-11-19 15:03 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-11-13 19:17 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-11-16 11:34 ` Hans de Goede
2024-11-18 10:05 ` Andy Shevchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2c828592-dbdd-4cd4-b366-70797d63329d@redhat.com \
--to=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=danielwa@cisco.com \
--cc=danilrybakov249@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=klarasmodin@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com \
--cc=xe-linux-external@cisco.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox