From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761687AbdEVTrr (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 May 2017 15:47:47 -0400 Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.4]:50866 "EHLO mout.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1761549AbdEVTri (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 May 2017 15:47:38 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] sctp: Delete an error message for a failed memory allocation in sctp_init() To: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner , linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: "David S. Miller" , Neil Horman , Vlad Yasevich , LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org References: <2845df67-d35d-536a-0a53-b2eb83fe1ba5@users.sourceforge.net> <7db0cb49-109b-88a6-532f-c591cc8ffa85@users.sourceforge.net> <20170522165658.GA4642@localhost.localdomain> From: SF Markus Elfring Message-ID: <2c849843-549f-419e-2326-1fcb7bcdc2e2@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 21:46:21 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170522165658.GA4642@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:hi1ILkCdSJkblrBS9fA9maySI5UXM6qjqt4Bx82i6SKKnCkKYhe co908CTYBux8nCiyEQy9R+LCOfYHGs1BuslWim7K0+Br7FssuPm0Kr4PHNbfH7P9tddlyDq o7XKrK6/YcnruDKFvRUna77jaZ+AqiTAkzDTKrVynTVmtvq5KWrFh4dsitiK2T9NFX4aprA +I/i0JX5HixVSVuImwkeA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:p6t5I9nlE24=:GTk6sIwv+DW153EJWVCYVf icbivfipqcl9rmXMMZ8s96EmSRRtGm7XNeDwajfSXKh5WxeLEiLsGrWPKlmQ5IhhakFyrhKlS RIX/jXs6V+ZnCJnX+fp5Mm+DYunAd+0P8mcmlFQ2tPorkM9N7lGcxv8mOf+lgG55cZ0JOZSGL 9NuAravDFwTYj+Hu9b20Oaye75usOKx+48vJk34hnS/hENDnmNl5v040D/yjhzLQw0QNMaPId 4hcxQk6G8MAwgbREKxTPGIZY/H+7zoHNPt3C8cafm/c6+LVgBtximvwGj5++H3T7P6un61Gi/ FW4t4HS+CiPu8MXrI9OxykobqhcKE4bj8nDpjJeA2utzCUVWOeVzNVb769VsM8+xLW9yTBoQJ TY9pU9JLIaiLF1WyKS8AC/1TzesuZRB7QwpsV4+bQl6PGzqGiBwEHtZZZbIZfVwL83nUNiVlI 3UImP8OI8LKZnYwai/Pp4G2SLaN1VhOaFGq9VtTSg9lP4N8IRLLpaCPBdJnSbX8U2m/uach0m 90cshjtS0N16AFpQwyRDOugt43MP/XuKzPuaiLLvCDOdjrj5Jy7Cy0cu6AZ02wb0rdE06DwGH k3EqQhd2jNe5EVObgVZCJc7/pEZ99NIG8i2S+3GUuK+J//59sz9Sr6Q6wcSu3FsQ7mIZqm04I Xk/hHE5PbMvv7cJ85h5AK7fKz4UADZ2dLrCe/w9vRdc1uq+enFqomZaokghPTbsnHu7DzWwOl HP7B9q5DkiQFZG1dXcxJw4b//XdhjhR8WKNnmi++SXBCfRf6KoQ976X6ES3+bJ8201rqV3lyx JowWTH+ Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >> +++ b/net/sctp/protocol.c >> @@ -1447,5 +1447,4 @@ static __init int sctp_init(void) >> if (!sctp_ep_hashtable) { >> - pr_err("Failed endpoint_hash alloc\n"); > > Okay but then why not also delete the one a few lines below this one: > if (!sctp_port_hashtable) { > pr_err("Failed bind hash alloc\n"); > status = -ENOMEM; > goto err_bhash_alloc; > } > Seems the same pattern to me. > >> status = -ENOMEM; >> goto err_ehash_alloc; >> } How do you think about to remove the other error message in another update step if a consensus would be achieved in such a direction for this software module? Regards, Markus