public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
To: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
	<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kernel@collabora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] soc: mediatek: mtk-cmdq: Mark very unlikely branches as such
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2024 14:58:26 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2cb6e2d6-226f-4a40-bdff-81baff8988a6@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <06c5573b-8b63-4a75-8af2-d6aace86fe69@collabora.com>



On 02/10/2024 14:43, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> Il 02/10/24 14:41, Matthias Brugger ha scritto:
>>
>>
>> On 18/09/2024 12:06, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
>>> Calling cmdq packet builders with an unsupported event number,
>>> or without left/right operands (in the case of logic commands)
>>> means that the caller (another driver) wants to perform an
>>> unsupported operation, so this means that the caller must be
>>> fixed instead.
>>>
>>> Anyway, such checks are here for safety and, unless any driver
>>> bug or any kind of misconfiguration is present, will always be
>>> false so add a very unlikely hint for those.
>>>
>>> Knowing that CPUs' branch predictors (and compilers, anyway) are
>>> indeed smart about these cases, this is done mainly for human
>>> readability purposes.
>>>
>>
>> Are you really sure we need that? As you mentioned the unlikely() is probably 
>> useless as compiler and branch predictions will do the job. I don't see the 
>> complexity in the code to have this annotations for human readability.
>>
>> I would argue against using unlikely() here as, in general, it is discouraged 
>> to use it. We will just create a data point of doing things that should only 
>> be done with very good reason. I don't see the reason here, it will only 
>> confuse other developers about the use of likely() and unlikely().
>>
> 
> If you have strong opinions I have no problem dropping this.

My take would be to drop it.

> Perhaps I can add a comment stating "this is very unlikely to happen and should
> be dropped after thorough cleanup", if that's better?
> 

As these are exported functions they could be used by out-of-tree modules, so it 
could make sense to check the input parameter. Maybe transform it to 
WARN_ON(event >= CMDQ_MAX_EVENT)?

Regards,
Matthias

> Cheers!
> Angelo
> 
>> Regards,
>> Matthias
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
>>> <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
>>> ---
>>>   drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-cmdq-helper.c | 10 +++++-----
>>>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-cmdq-helper.c 
>>> b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-cmdq-helper.c
>>> index 620c371fd1fc..4ffd1a35df87 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-cmdq-helper.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-cmdq-helper.c
>>> @@ -336,7 +336,7 @@ int cmdq_pkt_wfe(struct cmdq_pkt *pkt, u16 event, bool 
>>> clear)
>>>       struct cmdq_instruction inst = { {0} };
>>>       u32 clear_option = clear ? CMDQ_WFE_UPDATE : 0;
>>> -    if (event >= CMDQ_MAX_EVENT)
>>> +    if (unlikely(event >= CMDQ_MAX_EVENT))
>>>           return -EINVAL;
>>>       inst.op = CMDQ_CODE_WFE;
>>> @@ -351,7 +351,7 @@ int cmdq_pkt_acquire_event(struct cmdq_pkt *pkt, u16 event)
>>>   {
>>>       struct cmdq_instruction inst = {};
>>> -    if (event >= CMDQ_MAX_EVENT)
>>> +    if (unlikely(event >= CMDQ_MAX_EVENT))
>>>           return -EINVAL;
>>>       inst.op = CMDQ_CODE_WFE;
>>> @@ -366,7 +366,7 @@ int cmdq_pkt_clear_event(struct cmdq_pkt *pkt, u16 event)
>>>   {
>>>       struct cmdq_instruction inst = { {0} };
>>> -    if (event >= CMDQ_MAX_EVENT)
>>> +    if (unlikely(event >= CMDQ_MAX_EVENT))
>>>           return -EINVAL;
>>>       inst.op = CMDQ_CODE_WFE;
>>> @@ -381,7 +381,7 @@ int cmdq_pkt_set_event(struct cmdq_pkt *pkt, u16 event)
>>>   {
>>>       struct cmdq_instruction inst = {};
>>> -    if (event >= CMDQ_MAX_EVENT)
>>> +    if (unlikely(event >= CMDQ_MAX_EVENT))
>>>           return -EINVAL;
>>>       inst.op = CMDQ_CODE_WFE;
>>> @@ -476,7 +476,7 @@ int cmdq_pkt_logic_command(struct cmdq_pkt *pkt, u16 
>>> result_reg_idx,
>>>   {
>>>       struct cmdq_instruction inst = { {0} };
>>> -    if (!left_operand || !right_operand || s_op >= CMDQ_LOGIC_MAX)
>>> +    if (unlikely(!left_operand || !right_operand || s_op >= CMDQ_LOGIC_MAX))
>>>           return -EINVAL;
>>>       inst.op = CMDQ_CODE_LOGIC;
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2024-10-02 12:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-09-18 10:06 [PATCH v1 0/3] soc: mediatek: mtk-cmdq-helper: Various cleanups AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2024-09-18 10:06 ` [PATCH v1 1/3] soc: mediatek: mtk-cmdq: Move mask build and append to function AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2024-10-02 12:33   ` Matthias Brugger
2024-09-18 10:06 ` [PATCH v1 2/3] soc: mediatek: mtk-cmdq: Mark very unlikely branches as such AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2024-10-02 12:41   ` Matthias Brugger
2024-10-02 12:43     ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2024-10-02 12:58       ` Matthias Brugger [this message]
2024-10-02 13:02         ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2024-09-18 10:06 ` [PATCH v1 3/3] soc: mediatek: mtk-cmdq: Move cmdq_instruction init to declaration AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2024-09-19 22:43   ` kernel test robot
2024-10-02 12:52   ` Matthias Brugger
2024-10-02  9:08 ` [PATCH v1 0/3] soc: mediatek: mtk-cmdq-helper: Various cleanups AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2024-10-02 13:00   ` Matthias Brugger
2024-10-03  8:08     ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2024-10-07 14:33       ` Matthias Brugger
2024-10-07 14:36         ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2cb6e2d6-226f-4a40-bdff-81baff8988a6@gmail.com \
    --to=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
    --cc=kernel@collabora.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox