From: Coywolf Qi Hunt <coywolf@gmail.com>
To: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Dinakar Guniguntala <dino@in.ibm.com>,
Joel Schopp <jschopp@austin.ibm.com>,
Simon Derr <Simon.Derr@bull.net>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] cpusets oom_kill tweaks
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2005 17:39:39 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2cd57c900509010239670c07a2@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050901090859.18441.67380.sendpatchset@jackhammer.engr.sgi.com>
On 9/1/05, Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> wrote:
> This patch applies a few comment and code cleanups to mm/oom_kill.c
> prior to applying a few small patches to improve cpuset management of
> memory placement.
>
> The comment changed in oom_kill.c was seriously misleading. The code
> layout change in select_bad_process() makes room for adding another
> condition on which a process can be spared the oom killer (see the
> subsequent cpuset_nodes_overlap patch for this addition).
>
> Also a couple typos and spellos that bugged me, while I was here.
>
> This patch should have no material affect.
Why bother to have just added a variable, `releasing'?
--
Coywolf Qi Hunt
http://sosdg.org/~coywolf/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-09-01 9:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-09-01 9:08 [PATCH 0/4] cpusets mems_allowed constrain GFP_KERNEL, oom killer Paul Jackson
2005-09-01 9:08 ` [PATCH 1/4] cpusets oom_kill tweaks Paul Jackson
2005-09-01 9:39 ` Coywolf Qi Hunt [this message]
2005-09-01 9:58 ` Paul Jackson
2005-09-01 10:49 ` Coywolf Qi Hunt
2005-09-01 9:09 ` [PATCH 2/4] cpusets new __GFP_HARDWALL flag Paul Jackson
2005-09-01 9:09 ` [PATCH 3/4] cpusets formalize intermediate GFP_KERNEL containment Paul Jackson
2005-09-01 9:09 ` [PATCH 4/4] cpusets confine oom_killer to mem_exclusive cpuset Paul Jackson
2005-09-06 8:08 ` [PATCH 0/4] cpusets mems_allowed constrain GFP_KERNEL, oom killer Paul Jackson
2005-09-06 22:29 ` Paul Jackson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2cd57c900509010239670c07a2@mail.gmail.com \
--to=coywolf@gmail.com \
--cc=Simon.Derr@bull.net \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=dino@in.ibm.com \
--cc=haveblue@us.ibm.com \
--cc=jschopp@austin.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=pj@sgi.com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox