From: Carolina Jubran <cjubran@nvidia.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Gal Pressman <gal@nvidia.com>,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>,
Cosmin Ratiu <cratiu@nvidia.com>, Nimrod Oren <noren@nvidia.com>,
Mark Bloch <mbloch@nvidia.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] selftests: drv-net: Relax total BW check in devlink_rate_tc_bw.py
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2025 13:06:22 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2cdd9fa9-9fba-4880-aa92-c73033c668f9@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250908131917.10785ce0@kernel.org>
On 08/09/2025 23:19, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Sep 2025 22:16:29 +0300 Carolina Jubran wrote:
>> However, I’ll also need to extend load.py:
>>
>> 1. Binding support to ensure traffic flows through the specific VLAN
>> interface.
>> 2. Interval-based measurement for iperf3 --json to analyze only the
>> stable period.
>>
>> So my plan is:
>>
>> 1. Send v2 for net to fix the current test with interval-based
>> measurement.
>> 2. Follow up with a patch to extend load.py with reverse/binding/interval
>> support and then migrate the test to use it.
>>
>> Does that sound good to you?
> Sounds too complicated, this is just a stability improvement for a test
> which works on single device, and is not exercised / reported upstream.
> Let's jump straight to step 2.
Ack, I’ll drop this patch from the series and handle the migration to
load.py and reliability improvements in a follow-up.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-09 10:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-31 8:06 [PATCH 0/3] selftests: drv-net: Fix issues in devlink_rate_tc_bw.py Carolina Jubran
2025-08-31 8:06 ` [PATCH 1/3] selftests: drv-net: Fix and clarify TC bandwidth split " Carolina Jubran
2025-09-01 15:45 ` Simon Horman
2025-08-31 8:06 ` [PATCH 2/3] selftests: drv-net: Fix tolerance calculation " Carolina Jubran
2025-09-01 15:45 ` Simon Horman
2025-08-31 8:06 ` [PATCH 3/3] selftests: drv-net: Relax total BW check " Carolina Jubran
2025-09-01 15:46 ` Simon Horman
2025-09-02 23:21 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-09-05 22:32 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-09-08 19:16 ` Carolina Jubran
2025-09-08 20:19 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-09-09 10:06 ` Carolina Jubran [this message]
2025-09-09 21:04 ` Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2cdd9fa9-9fba-4880-aa92-c73033c668f9@nvidia.com \
--to=cjubran@nvidia.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=cratiu@nvidia.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=gal@nvidia.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbloch@nvidia.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=noren@nvidia.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox