From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1751672AbdBOOFm (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Wed, 15 Feb 2017 09:05:42 -0500
Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:46832 "EHLO
        smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1751361AbdBOOFj (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 15 Feb 2017 09:05:39 -0500
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org 5C26A607DD
Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org
Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=timur@codeaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tty: pl011: Work around QDF2400 E44 stuck BUSY bit
To: Christopher Covington <cov@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>,
        Aleksey Makarov <aleksey.makarov@linaro.org>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        shankerd@codeaurora.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
        Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.com>, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, Mark Langsdorf <mlangsdo@redhat.com>,
        Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com>, Jon Masters <jcm@redhat.com>,
        Neil Leeder <nleeder@codeaurora.org>
References: <20170214235347.8812-1-cov@codeaurora.org>
 <6a3ea0e5-f824-380e-1c4a-3e72b160e98a@codeaurora.org>
 <09772d07b3d6782690728ea171ac6e9e@codeaurora.org>
From: Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org>
Message-ID: <2d3173f5-8818-21cd-eccd-10fc6d5ec3bd@codeaurora.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 08:05:34 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:49.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Firefox/49.0 SeaMonkey/2.46
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <09772d07b3d6782690728ea171ac6e9e@codeaurora.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Christopher Covington wrote:
> Nothing needs QDF2400 erratum 44. Software should try to detect the presence
> of the erratum. So I think qdf2400_e44_detected or qdf2400_e44_present would
> make sense. But those suffixes don't add substantial value in my opinion.

I'd be okay with qdf2400_e44_detected or qdf2400_e44_present.  I think it's a 
lot clearer.  Another idea is "has_qdf2400_e44".

-- 
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation.