From: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
To: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>,
Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
leo.yan@arm.com
Cc: coresight@lists.linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] coresight: Convert tag clear function to take a struct cs_access
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2025 12:42:17 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2d3fb704-172c-4632-9e95-02bbfb8c0f90@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3bbf8aee-7b84-405a-8a3f-648c74196c2c@arm.com>
On 21/03/2025 11:02, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> On 20/03/2025 14:34, James Clark wrote:
>> The self hosted claim tag will be reset on device probe in a later
>> commit. We'll want to do this before coresight_register() is called so
>> won't have a coresight_device and have to use cs_access instead.
>>
>> Also make them public and create locked and unlocked versions for
>> later use.
>>
>> These look functions look like they set the whole tags register as one
>> value, but they only set and clear the self hosted bit using a SET/CLR
>> bits mechanism so also rename the functions to reflect this better.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@arm.com>
>> Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-core.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++
>> +--------
>> include/linux/coresight.h | 3 ++-
>> 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-core.c b/drivers/
>> hwtracing/coresight/coresight-core.c
>> index fb43ef6a3b1f..8471aefeac76 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-core.c
>> @@ -144,19 +144,30 @@ static inline bool
>> coresight_is_claimed_any(struct coresight_device *csdev)
>> return coresight_read_claim_tags(csdev) != 0;
>> }
>> -static inline void coresight_set_claim_tags(struct coresight_device
>> *csdev)
>> +static inline void coresight_set_self_claim_tag(struct
>> coresight_device *csdev)
>
> nit: For consistency, this should be renamed to _unlocked ?
>
minor nit on the subject;
s/cs_access/csdev_access/
Suzuki
>
Rest looks fine to me
>
> Suzuki
>
>
>> {
>> csdev_access_relaxed_write32(&csdev->access,
>> CORESIGHT_CLAIM_SELF_HOSTED,
>> CORESIGHT_CLAIMSET);
>> isb();
>> }
>> -static inline void coresight_clear_claim_tags(struct coresight_device
>> *csdev)
>> +void coresight_clear_self_claim_tag(struct csdev_access *csa)
>> {
>> - csdev_access_relaxed_write32(&csdev->access,
>> CORESIGHT_CLAIM_SELF_HOSTED,
>> + if (csa->io_mem)
>> + CS_UNLOCK(csa->base);
>> + coresight_clear_self_claim_tag_unlocked(csa);
>> + if (csa->io_mem)
>> + CS_LOCK(csa->base);
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(coresight_clear_self_claim_tag);
>> +
>> +void coresight_clear_self_claim_tag_unlocked(struct csdev_access *csa)
>> +{
>> + csdev_access_relaxed_write32(csa, CORESIGHT_CLAIM_SELF_HOSTED,
>> CORESIGHT_CLAIMCLR);
>> isb();
>> }
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(coresight_clear_self_claim_tag_unlocked);
>> /*
>> * coresight_claim_device_unlocked : Claim the device for self-
>> hosted usage
>> @@ -176,11 +187,11 @@ int coresight_claim_device_unlocked(struct
>> coresight_device *csdev)
>> if (coresight_is_claimed_any(csdev))
>> return -EBUSY;
>> - coresight_set_claim_tags(csdev);
>> + coresight_set_self_claim_tag(csdev);
>> if (coresight_is_claimed_self_hosted(csdev))
>> return 0;
>> - /* There was a race setting the tags, clean up and fail */
>> - coresight_clear_claim_tags(csdev);
>> + /* There was a race setting the tag, clean up and fail */
>> + coresight_clear_self_claim_tag_unlocked(&csdev->access);
>> return -EBUSY;
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(coresight_claim_device_unlocked);
>> @@ -201,7 +212,7 @@ int coresight_claim_device(struct coresight_device
>> *csdev)
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(coresight_claim_device);
>> /*
>> - * coresight_disclaim_device_unlocked : Clear the claim tags for the
>> device.
>> + * coresight_disclaim_device_unlocked : Clear the claim tag for the
>> device.
>> * Called with CS_UNLOCKed for the component.
>> */
>> void coresight_disclaim_device_unlocked(struct coresight_device *csdev)
>> @@ -211,7 +222,7 @@ void coresight_disclaim_device_unlocked(struct
>> coresight_device *csdev)
>> return;
>> if (coresight_is_claimed_self_hosted(csdev))
>> - coresight_clear_claim_tags(csdev);
>> + coresight_clear_self_claim_tag_unlocked(&csdev->access);
>> else
>> /*
>> * The external agent may have not honoured our claim
>> diff --git a/include/linux/coresight.h b/include/linux/coresight.h
>> index d79a242b271d..00134a80d358 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/coresight.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/coresight.h
>> @@ -685,7 +685,8 @@ extern int coresight_timeout_action(struct
>> csdev_access *csa, u32 offset,
>> extern int coresight_claim_device(struct coresight_device *csdev);
>> extern int coresight_claim_device_unlocked(struct coresight_device
>> *csdev);
>> -
>> +void coresight_clear_self_claim_tag(struct csdev_access *csa);
>> +void coresight_clear_self_claim_tag_unlocked(struct csdev_access *csa);
>> extern void coresight_disclaim_device(struct coresight_device *csdev);
>> extern void coresight_disclaim_device_unlocked(struct
>> coresight_device *csdev);
>> extern char *coresight_alloc_device_name(struct coresight_dev_list
>> *devs,
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-21 12:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-20 14:34 [PATCH v3 0/7] coresight: Clear self hosted claim tag on probe James Clark
2025-03-20 14:34 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] coresight: Convert tag clear function to take a struct cs_access James Clark
2025-03-21 11:02 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-03-21 12:42 ` Suzuki K Poulose [this message]
2025-03-25 12:00 ` James Clark
2025-03-20 14:34 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] coresight: Only check bottom two claim bits James Clark
2025-03-21 12:10 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-03-25 13:47 ` James Clark
2025-03-20 14:34 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] coresight: Add claim tag warnings and debug messages James Clark
2025-03-20 14:34 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] coresight: etm3x: Convert raw base pointer to struct coresight access James Clark
2025-03-20 14:34 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] coresight: Clear self hosted claim tag on probe James Clark
2025-03-20 14:34 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] coresight: Remove inlines from static function definitions James Clark
2025-03-20 14:34 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] coresight: Remove extern from function declarations James Clark
2025-03-20 15:48 ` [PATCH v3 0/7] coresight: Clear self hosted claim tag on probe Yeoreum Yun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2d3fb704-172c-4632-9e95-02bbfb8c0f90@arm.com \
--to=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
--cc=coresight@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
--cc=leo.yan@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
--cc=mike.leach@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox