Re: [PATCH] iommu/ipmmu-vmsa: Remove ipmmu_utlb_disable()

[Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>]

On 2023/1/14 5:29, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 03:45:46PM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 08:25:17PM +0100, Joerg Roedel wrote:
>>> In general it is a good idea to at least compile-test every file that is
>>> changed in a patch-set before sending it out and not rely on 0-day bot
>>> for that.
>> Against every arch combination? This is why we have automation bots 🙁
> No, not every combination. But if possible please compile-test each
> changed file with a .config that pulls that source file in.  Lots of
> drivers can be enabled just with COMPILE_TEST on x86 or be catched with
> a generic ARM/ARM64 config which enables all IOMMU drivers.  PAMU is a
> bit more difficult as it requires a PPC-32 bit config, but that is the
> exception.
> 
> A full kernel build is usually also not necessary, often a 'make
> drivers/iommu/' with a given config is enough.
> 
> That is also how I compile-test the IOMMU tree before I push changes
> out. There are per-arch configurations which select all IOMMU drivers on
> that arch. Only for X86 I do the full allnoconfig, defconfig,
> allmodconfig and allyesconfig cycle (each for 32 and 64 bit).
> 
> That certainly does not catch everything, but a lot of compile issues can be
> found that way. And for patch-sets only touching, for example, VT-d it
> is still enough to only compile-test on x86. A patch-set touching that
> much drivers is rather the exception.

This one as well. Thank you for your feedback on 0-day.

--
Best regards,
baolu