The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Zhou, Yun" <yun.zhou@windriver.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: pc@manguebit.org, netfs@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	hch@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] netfs: fix writeback ENOMEM by using __GFP_NOFAIL for rolling buffer
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2026 19:08:38 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2e003306-e6cf-4b4e-a0cb-19beb1ea08d4@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <974342.1785146612@warthog.procyon.org.uk>

On 7/27/26 18:03, David Howells wrote:
> Yun Zhou <yun.zhou@windriver.com> wrote:
> 
>> rolling_buffer_init() uses plain GFP_NOFS for its folio_queue allocation.
>> In the writeback path this can fail and trigger WARN_ON_ONCE(folio != NULL)
>> in netfs_writepages() when writeback_iter() returns additional dirty folios
>> left unhandled.
>>
>> Writeback must not fail with -ENOMEM. Fix this by adding a gfp_t parameter
>> to rolling_buffer_init() and passing GFP_NOFS | __GFP_NOFAIL from the
>> writeback path, ensuring the allocation always succeeds. Read paths
>> continue to use plain GFP_NOFS.
> 
> I don't think this is the correct solution.  I think you're right that a gfp_t
> needs to be passed into rolling_buffer*(), but I think we need a mempool as
> well.
> 
> I have most of the patch for that, but I think I need adjust things so that
> the read path uses GFP_KERNEL, not GFP_NOFS.
> 

Got it. Your mempool approach looks good. Please let me know if you need 
anything from me.

BR,
Yun

      reply	other threads:[~2026-07-27 11:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-24  7:30 [PATCH v2] netfs: fix writeback ENOMEM by using __GFP_NOFAIL for rolling buffer Yun Zhou
2026-07-27 10:03 ` David Howells
2026-07-27 11:08   ` Zhou, Yun [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2e003306-e6cf-4b4e-a0cb-19beb1ea08d4@windriver.com \
    --to=yun.zhou@windriver.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfs@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=pc@manguebit.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox