public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: yhlu <yinghailu@gmail.com>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: "Ronald G. Minnich" <rminnich@lanl.gov>,
	Stefan Reinauer <stepan@openbios.org>,
	discuss@x86-64.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [discuss] Re: NUMA support for dual core Opteron
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 19:46:49 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2ea3fae1050714194649c66d7e@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050714190929.GL23619@wotan.suse.de>

I didn't see any problem about NUMA with LinuxBIOS + 8way dual core system.
of couse the acpi support in Kernel is disabled.

p.s. can you use powernow when acpi is disabled?
p.s.s  Is powerpc64 support ACPI? or ACPI is only can be used by x86?

YH

On 7/14/05, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> wrote:
> [closed mailing list dropped. Sorry I have no plans to argue with
> your mailbots]
> 
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 01:00:01PM -0600, Ronald G. Minnich wrote:
> > if there is any chance of getting along without ACPI entries that is best.
> > Linux did do this once already, for SMP K8: K8 can boot and run NUMA
> > without an SRAT table. What more is needed for dual core, and could Linux
> > support in this area be extended?
> 
> The dual core NUMA parsing problem could be probably fixed. I personally
> have no plans to work on it though, since the ACPI method works fine.
> 
> Feel free to submit patches.
> 
> However with 90+W CPUs I would strongly recommend having support
> for PowerNow! and the old style PST table doesn't support
> dual core or SMP, so you need ACPI for that anyways.
> 
> -Andi
>

  reply	other threads:[~2005-07-15  2:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-07-14 17:58 NUMA support for dual core Opteron yhlu
2005-07-14 18:29 ` [LinuxBIOS] " Li-Ta Lo
2005-07-14 18:48   ` [discuss] " Andi Kleen
2005-07-14 18:58     ` yhlu
2005-07-14 19:04     ` Ronald G. Minnich
2005-07-14 19:54       ` Andi Kleen
2005-07-14 18:48   ` yhlu
2005-07-14 18:52   ` [discuss] " Andi Kleen
2005-07-14 19:00 ` Ronald G. Minnich
2005-07-14 19:09   ` [discuss] " Andi Kleen
2005-07-15  2:46     ` yhlu [this message]
2005-07-15  3:05       ` Andi Kleen
2005-07-15  3:52         ` yhlu
2005-07-15  4:05           ` Andi Kleen
2005-07-15  4:14             ` yhlu
2005-07-15 14:37         ` Ronald G. Minnich
2005-07-15 18:15     ` Tom Vier
2005-07-15 18:20       ` Andi Kleen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2ea3fae1050714194649c66d7e@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=yinghailu@gmail.com \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=discuss@x86-64.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rminnich@lanl.gov \
    --cc=stepan@openbios.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox