From: Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>,
Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware: qcom: qcm: fix unused qcom_scm_qseecom_allowlist
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2023 20:56:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2f14aab8-a5bb-4af4-9475-afe6b678a7fd@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231120185623.338608-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
On 11/20/23 19:56, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> For !OF builds, the qcom_scm_qseecom_allowlist is unused:
>
> drivers/firmware/qcom/qcom_scm.c:1652:34: error: ‘qcom_scm_qseecom_allowlist’ defined but not used [-Werror=unused-const-variable=]
>
> Fixes: 00b1248606ba ("firmware: qcom_scm: Add support for Qualcomm Secure Execution Environment SCM interface")
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202311191654.S4wlVUrz-lkp@intel.com/
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/firmware/qcom/qcom_scm.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/qcom/qcom_scm.c b/drivers/firmware/qcom/qcom_scm.c
> index 520de9b5633a..ecdb367dc9b8 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/qcom/qcom_scm.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/qcom/qcom_scm.c
> @@ -1649,7 +1649,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(qcom_scm_qseecom_app_send);
> * We do not yet support re-entrant calls via the qseecom interface. To prevent
> + any potential issues with this, only allow validated machines for now.
> */
> -static const struct of_device_id qcom_scm_qseecom_allowlist[] = {
> +static const struct of_device_id qcom_scm_qseecom_allowlist[] __maybe_unused = {
> { .compatible = "lenovo,thinkpad-x13s", },
> { }
> };
Thanks! Given that we're right now only allowing qseecom clients to load
on devices within that list, maybe it would be cleaner to make
QCOM_QSEECOM depend on OF explicitly instead?
Anyway, I'm also fine with this solution.
Acked-by: Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-20 20:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-20 18:56 [PATCH] firmware: qcom: qcm: fix unused qcom_scm_qseecom_allowlist Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-11-20 19:56 ` Maximilian Luz [this message]
2023-11-21 7:07 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-11-21 10:54 ` Maximilian Luz
2024-04-03 22:37 ` Elliot Berman
2024-04-04 21:22 ` Bjorn Andersson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2f14aab8-a5bb-4af4-9475-afe6b678a7fd@gmail.com \
--to=luzmaximilian@gmail.com \
--cc=agross@kernel.org \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=johan+linaro@kernel.org \
--cc=konrad.dybcio@linaro.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox