Re: [PATCH 13/18] i2c: rk3x: remove printout on handled timeouts

Dragan Simic
2024-04-13T08:12:33Z

Hello Heiko,

On 2024-04-13 09:58, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> Am Samstag, 13. April 2024, 08:44:41 CEST schrieb Dragan Simic:
>> On 2024-04-13 08:38, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>> >> Maybe it would be good to turn it into a debug message, instead of
>> >> simply removing it? Maybe not all client drivers handle it correctly,
>> >> in which case having an easy way for debugging would be beneficial.
>> >
>> > Hmm, but it still returns -ETIMEDOUT to distinguish cases?
>>
>> Sure, but I think that having such an additional debug facility
>> can only help and save the people from adding temporary printk()s
>> while debugging.
>
> Also we're talking about two lines of code, I wouldn't call that bloat
> ;-)
> I was thinking about dev_dbg vs. removal too, but hadn't a clear
> favorite.
>
> So essentially Dragan is tipping the scale and I guess dev_dbg might be
> the nicer way to go.

Yes, the code for printing the message is already there and it's only
a couple of lines, so it might be a good idea to recycle it. :)