public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH 1/1] selftests/liveupdate: Cleanup kernel optio CONFIG_LIVEUPDATE_TEST
@ 2026-01-30  4:28 Zhu Yanjun
  2026-01-30  4:31 ` Zhu Yanjun
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Zhu Yanjun @ 2026-01-30  4:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: pasha.tatashin, rppt, pratyush, shuah, linux-kernel,
	linux-kselftest
  Cc: Zhu Yanjun

The kernel option CONFIG_LIVEUPDATE_TEST does not exist currently.
Remove it.

No functional changes.

Signed-off-by: Zhu Yanjun <yanjun.zhu@linux.dev>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/liveupdate/config | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/liveupdate/config b/tools/testing/selftests/liveupdate/config
index 91d03f9a6a39..80bd5d5e2976 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/liveupdate/config
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/liveupdate/config
@@ -5,7 +5,6 @@ CONFIG_KEXEC_HANDOVER_ENABLE_DEFAULT=y
 CONFIG_KEXEC_HANDOVER_DEBUGFS=y
 CONFIG_KEXEC_HANDOVER_DEBUG=y
 CONFIG_LIVEUPDATE=y
-CONFIG_LIVEUPDATE_TEST=y
 CONFIG_MEMFD_CREATE=y
 CONFIG_TMPFS=y
 CONFIG_SHMEM=y
-- 
2.52.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/1] selftests/liveupdate: Cleanup kernel optio CONFIG_LIVEUPDATE_TEST
  2026-01-30  4:28 [PATCH 1/1] selftests/liveupdate: Cleanup kernel optio CONFIG_LIVEUPDATE_TEST Zhu Yanjun
@ 2026-01-30  4:31 ` Zhu Yanjun
  2026-02-10 13:36   ` Pratyush Yadav
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Zhu Yanjun @ 2026-01-30  4:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: pasha.tatashin, rppt, pratyush, shuah, linux-kernel,
	linux-kselftest


在 2026/1/29 20:28, Zhu Yanjun 写道:
> The kernel option CONFIG_LIVEUPDATE_TEST does not exist currently.
> Remove it.

In kernel 6.19-rc7, this kernel option still exists in the file

tools/testing/selftests/liveupdate/config. Thus I send out this commit 
to remove it.

Zhu Yanjun

>
> No functional changes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhu Yanjun <yanjun.zhu@linux.dev>
> ---
>   tools/testing/selftests/liveupdate/config | 1 -
>   1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/liveupdate/config b/tools/testing/selftests/liveupdate/config
> index 91d03f9a6a39..80bd5d5e2976 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/liveupdate/config
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/liveupdate/config
> @@ -5,7 +5,6 @@ CONFIG_KEXEC_HANDOVER_ENABLE_DEFAULT=y
>   CONFIG_KEXEC_HANDOVER_DEBUGFS=y
>   CONFIG_KEXEC_HANDOVER_DEBUG=y
>   CONFIG_LIVEUPDATE=y
> -CONFIG_LIVEUPDATE_TEST=y
>   CONFIG_MEMFD_CREATE=y
>   CONFIG_TMPFS=y
>   CONFIG_SHMEM=y

-- 
Best Regards,
Yanjun.Zhu


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/1] selftests/liveupdate: Cleanup kernel optio CONFIG_LIVEUPDATE_TEST
  2026-01-30  4:31 ` Zhu Yanjun
@ 2026-02-10 13:36   ` Pratyush Yadav
  2026-02-10 18:15     ` Yanjun.Zhu
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Pratyush Yadav @ 2026-02-10 13:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Zhu Yanjun
  Cc: pasha.tatashin, rppt, pratyush, shuah, linux-kernel,
	linux-kselftest

On Thu, Jan 29 2026, Zhu Yanjun wrote:

> 在 2026/1/29 20:28, Zhu Yanjun 写道:
>> The kernel option CONFIG_LIVEUPDATE_TEST does not exist currently.
>> Remove it.
>
> In kernel 6.19-rc7, this kernel option still exists in the file
>
> tools/testing/selftests/liveupdate/config. Thus I send out this commit to remove
> it.

Yes, but the patch to add the config is in mm-nonmm-unstable. I am not
sure if this worth the churn of removing this and re-adding it when that
patch lands later. Do you see a real problem with this?

>
[...]

-- 
Regards,
Pratyush Yadav

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/1] selftests/liveupdate: Cleanup kernel optio CONFIG_LIVEUPDATE_TEST
  2026-02-10 13:36   ` Pratyush Yadav
@ 2026-02-10 18:15     ` Yanjun.Zhu
  2026-02-12 13:01       ` Pratyush Yadav
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Yanjun.Zhu @ 2026-02-10 18:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Pratyush Yadav; +Cc: pasha.tatashin, rppt, shuah, linux-kernel, linux-kselftest


On 2/10/26 5:36 AM, Pratyush Yadav wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 29 2026, Zhu Yanjun wrote:
>
>> 在 2026/1/29 20:28, Zhu Yanjun 写道:
>>> The kernel option CONFIG_LIVEUPDATE_TEST does not exist currently.
>>> Remove it.
>> In kernel 6.19-rc7, this kernel option still exists in the file
>>
>> tools/testing/selftests/liveupdate/config. Thus I send out this commit to remove
>> it.
> Yes, but the patch to add the config is in mm-nonmm-unstable. I am not
> sure if this worth the churn of removing this and re-adding it when that
> patch lands later. Do you see a real problem with this?
Thanks for the feedback.

I understand that the patch adding this functionality is currently in 
mm-nonmm-unstable. My concern was primarily adhering to the 
documentation, which suggests keeping the kernel configs pruned of 
unused options to avoid confusion for those running selftests.

However, I see your point regarding the churn. If you prefer, we can 
wait until the mm-nonmm-unstable branch is merged into the mainline. 
Once that happens, if this option remains truly redundant or if the 
implementation changes, I can resubmit the cleanup then.

Does that sound like a reasonable compromise to you?

Best regards,

Yanjun.Zhu

>
> [...]
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/1] selftests/liveupdate: Cleanup kernel optio CONFIG_LIVEUPDATE_TEST
  2026-02-10 18:15     ` Yanjun.Zhu
@ 2026-02-12 13:01       ` Pratyush Yadav
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Pratyush Yadav @ 2026-02-12 13:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Yanjun.Zhu
  Cc: Pratyush Yadav, pasha.tatashin, rppt, shuah, linux-kernel,
	linux-kselftest

On Tue, Feb 10 2026, Yanjun.Zhu wrote:

> On 2/10/26 5:36 AM, Pratyush Yadav wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 29 2026, Zhu Yanjun wrote:
>>
>>> 在 2026/1/29 20:28, Zhu Yanjun 写道:
>>>> The kernel option CONFIG_LIVEUPDATE_TEST does not exist currently.
>>>> Remove it.
>>> In kernel 6.19-rc7, this kernel option still exists in the file
>>>
>>> tools/testing/selftests/liveupdate/config. Thus I send out this commit to remove
>>> it.
>> Yes, but the patch to add the config is in mm-nonmm-unstable. I am not
>> sure if this worth the churn of removing this and re-adding it when that
>> patch lands later. Do you see a real problem with this?
> Thanks for the feedback.
>
> I understand that the patch adding this functionality is currently in
> mm-nonmm-unstable. My concern was primarily adhering to the documentation, which
> suggests keeping the kernel configs pruned of unused options to avoid confusion
> for those running selftests.
>
> However, I see your point regarding the churn. If you prefer, we can wait until
> the mm-nonmm-unstable branch is merged into the mainline. Once that happens, if
> this option remains truly redundant or if the implementation changes, I can
> resubmit the cleanup then.
>
> Does that sound like a reasonable compromise to you?

Yes, sounds good. And even though I don't recommend taking this patch
right now, the effort to keep things clean is much appreciated!

-- 
Regards,
Pratyush Yadav

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2026-02-12 13:01 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-01-30  4:28 [PATCH 1/1] selftests/liveupdate: Cleanup kernel optio CONFIG_LIVEUPDATE_TEST Zhu Yanjun
2026-01-30  4:31 ` Zhu Yanjun
2026-02-10 13:36   ` Pratyush Yadav
2026-02-10 18:15     ` Yanjun.Zhu
2026-02-12 13:01       ` Pratyush Yadav

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox