From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7FEB43F4821 for ; Fri, 5 Jun 2026 13:09:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1780664975; cv=none; b=fln/Fb197CvGhS4UgT5ql60XspHrPoHAtTRVS/8QXNuzdFxcJtfXQ17ttuK4mJBEY4cUVY3swq1sPMpavZh4CIVG2DdXRhrWQ/dtFoCpBKyyl/xEzGgshqvfM479xT09DPU8uKmrmf3U1KcGcR7qTJ12jHub5kbrrdIiDzpTA6k= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1780664975; c=relaxed/simple; bh=+PIqhO62jrnvWmBNTdlZ4HsfwozuIah67+dLq4HYGlY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=SXELcl9Mfuyw/v3oOfXLubHUjEj29yfyrBnDpGwdfee1wntkkYKG6iuhPQvwmuXFFDCJVccbpfdg7H/FmSfhcZZUVqotsjqlNpbYKlYHMPR7CGt93xpL8qHF4DGIvPF1xs9cxCbKzXCLj4Vbpu90pjEhB+Q8UPx08b+flTHSeoA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=lshDNLBh; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="lshDNLBh" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A8ED91F0089B; Fri, 5 Jun 2026 13:09:28 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1780664969; bh=MSUGCFZbkdGQsRUVae3QaiSIyG10l/zFA2SJJnCDFTk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=lshDNLBhgZQFNVje19VffYLe+ZFC9W8lZQs2f3s7kwfrG09Clru/mXdMIUrdWeUvV kCiF9w2g8mOgl6ct8wSWE3zgj4Q2m0tSIaQLC5U8NmLNPDH0Q7owm1jdvRa0jTJaUd hd1p1QmHyhHMXpXP8ZCT1YeChPdn555tDHPz/WzVbZZFQe7xK8RKyQ+TX2kov6EfBu Pk6m0a2CX5c4t+rY/dkGc0irf8OEmopivtpCa5b/mUH9P5Be9vkwWDp3G8iHXiQXVq /vOeGHmozLHEazZGAjZya4DT1m0ZRKC7GALyTNiOFlc2Qmc5jXMxJ2ZKUg143VBDTt UXssIgzG71Qgg== From: Pratyush Yadav To: Mike Rapoport Cc: David Matlack , kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Pasha Tatashin , Pratyush Yadav Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] liveupdate: Small FLB fixes In-Reply-To: (Mike Rapoport's message of "Thu, 4 Jun 2026 08:28:57 +0300") References: <20260528174140.1921129-1-dmatlack@google.com> Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2026 15:09:27 +0200 Message-ID: <2vxzcxy5i16g.fsf@kernel.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain On Thu, Jun 04 2026, Mike Rapoport wrote: > On Thu, May 28, 2026 at 05:41:38PM +0000, David Matlack wrote: >> This series has 2 small fixes to how FLBs are managed. First is to >> increase the outgoing FLB refcount during liveupdate_flb_get_outgoing() >> so it cannot be freed while the caller is using it, and to align with >> the semantics of liveupdate_flb_get_incoming(). The second is to prevent >> FLB retrieve() from being called multiple times if the first attempt >> fails. >> >> Both of these changes are needed for the correctness of the PCI core >> support for Live Update: >> >> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20260522202410.3104264-1-dmatlack@google.com/ > > We are late in the release cycle and since there no in-tree flb users let's > postpone this after rc1. Yes, I agree. [...] -- Regards, Pratyush Yadav