From: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>
To: Hendrik Donner <hd@os-cillation.de>
Cc: Michael Walle <mwalle@kernel.org>,
Sanjaikumar V S <sanjaikumarvs@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
miquel.raynal@bootlin.com, pratyush@kernel.org, richard@nod.at,
sanjaikumar.vs@dicortech.com, stable@vger.kernel.org,
tudor.ambarus@linaro.org, vigneshr@ti.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] mtd: spi-nor: sst: Fix write enable before AAI sequence
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2026 11:46:37 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2vxzpl58dk9u.fsf@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8a1db3a5-09b3-4ef1-87e8-66553a81ec27@os-cillation.de> (Hendrik Donner's message of "Fri, 6 Mar 2026 23:36:03 +0100")
On Fri, Mar 06 2026, Hendrik Donner wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 2/23/26 10:29, Michael Walle wrote:
>> Hi,
>> On Mon Feb 23, 2026 at 10:17 AM CET, Sanjaikumar V S wrote:
>>>> Raises concern about writes ending at odd offsets potentially
>>>> having the same issue
>>>
>>> The odd end address case (trailing byte) is already handled in the
>>> existing code at lines 243-255:
>>>
>>> /* Write out trailing byte if it exists. */
>>> if (actual != len) {
>>> ret = spi_nor_write_enable(nor);
>>> ...
>>> ret = sst_nor_write_data(nor, to, 1, buf + actual);
>>> }
>> Ah, I must be blind. I stopped reading at the write_disable.
>>
>>> So write_enable is already called before writing the trailing
>>> byte. My patch only addresses the odd start case where BP clears
>>> WEL before the AAI sequence begins.
>>>
>>>> Suggests simplifying the conditional logic by removing the length
>>>> check
>>>
>>> The condition `if (actual < len - 1)` avoids an unnecessary
>>> write_enable when len == 1 (single byte write at odd address, no
>>> AAI follows). But if you prefer unconditional write_enable for
>>> simplicity, I can change it in v3.
>> I know, but I actually don't like repeating the condition in the for
>> loop. So I'd prefer to have a local "needs_write_enable" boolean
>> which will be set to true. But then, I wouldn't care too much if
>> there is a write enable followed by a write disable for a rare case.
>>
>>>> Notes the patch lacks runtime testing
>>>
>>> I don't have the hardware setup to test odd-address writes at the
>>> moment. The fix is based on code analysis. I have tested patch 2/2
>>> (dirmap fallback) on hardware.
>> I'm hesitant - because like I said, if there is really a bug - it
>> would have never worked correctly, since day 1. But yeah, I've also
>> read the datasheet and it clearly states that the byte write will
>> clear the write enable latch.
>>
>
> i can confirm both patches fix real issues, i have similiar fixes
> on a kernel tree i always wanted to clean up and upstream. Diffs
> based on 6.6.127:
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/sst.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/sst.c
> index 197d2c1101ed5..eaa50561ede2c 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/sst.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/sst.c
> @@ -155,6 +155,13 @@ static int sst_nor_write(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t to, size_t len,
> if (ret)
> goto out;
>
> + ret = spi_nor_write_enable(nor);
> + if (ret)
> + goto out;
> + ret = spi_nor_wait_till_ready(nor);
> + if (ret)
> + goto out;
> +
> to++;
> actual++;
> }
>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c
> index 1b0c6770c14e4..646bfb2e91a65 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c
> @@ -276,7 +276,7 @@ static ssize_t spi_nor_spimem_write_data(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t to,
> if (spi_nor_spimem_bounce(nor, &op))
> memcpy(nor->bouncebuf, buf, op.data.nbytes);
>
> - if (nor->dirmap.wdesc) {
> + if (nor->dirmap.wdesc && nor->program_opcode != SPINOR_OP_AAI_WP) {
Why is this better? This removes the use of dirmap for all flashes other
than SST.
> nbytes = spi_mem_dirmap_write(nor->dirmap.wdesc, op.addr.val,
> op.data.nbytes, op.data.buf.out);
> } else {
>
>
> I think patch 2 of this series is the better approach though.
There is a v4 here:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20260311103057.29-1-sanjaikumarvs@gmail.com/T/#u
Can you please review and test it so we can apply it?
>
> Regards,
> Hendrik
>
>>> Please let me know if you'd like me to send a v3 with the
>>> simplified unconditional write_enable.
>> Please see above.
>> -michael
>> ______________________________________________________
>> Linux MTD discussion mailing list
>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
>
--
Regards,
Pratyush Yadav
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-13 11:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-20 9:42 [PATCH v2 0/2] mtd: spi-nor: Fix SST AAI write mode Sanjaikumar V S
2026-02-20 9:42 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] mtd: spi-nor: sst: Fix write enable before AAI sequence Sanjaikumar V S
2026-02-23 8:18 ` Michael Walle
2026-02-23 9:17 ` Sanjaikumar V S
2026-02-23 9:29 ` Michael Walle
2026-03-06 22:36 ` Hendrik Donner
2026-03-13 11:46 ` Pratyush Yadav [this message]
2026-03-13 12:50 ` Hendrik Donner
2026-03-13 13:39 ` Pratyush Yadav
2026-02-20 9:42 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] mtd: spi-nor: core: Fix AAI mode when dirmap is not available Sanjaikumar V S
2026-02-23 10:17 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] mtd: spi-nor: Fix SST AAI write mode Sanjaikumar V S
2026-02-23 10:17 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] mtd: spi-nor: sst: Fix write enable before AAI sequence Sanjaikumar V S
2026-02-23 10:17 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] mtd: spi-nor: core: Fix AAI mode when dirmap is not available Sanjaikumar V S
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2vxzpl58dk9u.fsf@kernel.org \
--to=pratyush@kernel.org \
--cc=hd@os-cillation.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=mwalle@kernel.org \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=sanjaikumar.vs@dicortech.com \
--cc=sanjaikumarvs@gmail.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tudor.ambarus@linaro.org \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox