From: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>
To: Chenghao Duan <duanchenghao@kylinos.cn>
Cc: pasha.tatashin@soleen.com, rppt@kernel.org,
pratyush@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
jianghaoran@kylinos.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/7] mm/memfd_luo: remove folio from page cache when accounting fails
Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2026 11:52:57 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2vxzzf3lfujq.fsf@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260326084727.118437-7-duanchenghao@kylinos.cn> (Chenghao Duan's message of "Thu, 26 Mar 2026 16:47:26 +0800")
On Thu, Mar 26 2026, Chenghao Duan wrote:
> In memfd_luo_retrieve_folios(), when shmem_inode_acct_blocks() fails
> after successfully adding the folio to the page cache, the code jumps
> to unlock_folio without removing the folio from the page cache.
>
> This leaves the folio permanently abandoned in the page cache:
> - The folio was added via shmem_add_to_page_cache() which set up
> mapping, index, and incremented nrpages/shmem stats.
> - folio_unlock() and folio_put() do not remove it from the cache.
> - folio_add_lru() was never called, so it cannot be reclaimed.
This is just not true. The folio is _not_ "permanently abandoned" in the
page cache. When fput() is called by memfd_luo_retrieve(), it will
eventually call shmem_undo_range() on the whole mapping and free all the
folios in there.
I went and looked at shmem_undo_range() and the accompanying accounting
logic, and all that seems to be impervious to this type of superfluous
folio in the filemap. Main reason being that shmem_recalc_inode()
directly uses mapping->nrpages after truncation so even if you don't
account for the folio, as long as you get rid of the whole file (which
we do) it doesn't matter.
I think the only place I can see this causing trouble is maybe in LRU
accounting, though I really don't understand how any of that works so
dunno.
Anyway, I do think this patch is worth having. It keeps the filemap
clean and gets rid of the need of this complex reasoning to figure out
if this is safe.
So I think the commit message needs reworking. Perhaps something like
the below:
mm/memfd_luo: remove folio from page cache when accounting fails
In memfd_luo_retrieve_folios(), when shmem_inode_acct_blocks() fails
after successfully adding the folio to the page cache, the code jumps
to unlock_folio without removing the folio from the page cache.
While the folio eventually will be freed when the file is released by
memfd_luo_retrieve(), it is a good idea to directly remove a folio that
was not fully added to the file. This avoids the possibility of
accounting mismatches in shmem or filemap core.
Fix by adding a remove_from_cache label that calls filemap_remove_folio()
before unlocking, matching the error handling pattern in
shmem_alloc_and_add_folio().
This issue was identified by the AI review.
https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260323110747.193569-1-duanchenghao@kylinos.cn
With that,
Reviewed-by: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>
>
> Fix by adding a remove_from_cache label that calls filemap_remove_folio()
> before unlocking, matching the error handling pattern in
> shmem_alloc_and_add_folio().
>
> This issue was identified by the AI review.
> https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260323110747.193569-1-duanchenghao@kylinos.cn
>
> Signed-off-by: Chenghao Duan <duanchenghao@kylinos.cn>
[...]
--
Regards,
Pratyush Yadav
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-02 11:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-26 8:47 [PATCH v3 0/7] Modify memfd_luo code Chenghao Duan
2026-03-26 8:47 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] mm/memfd: use folio_nr_pages() for shmem inode accounting Chenghao Duan
2026-04-02 1:23 ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-04-02 10:59 ` Pratyush Yadav
2026-03-26 8:47 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] mm/memfd_luo: optimize shmem_recalc_inode calls in retrieve path Chenghao Duan
2026-04-02 11:02 ` Pratyush Yadav
2026-03-26 8:47 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] mm/memfd_luo: remove unnecessary memset in zero-size memfd path Chenghao Duan
2026-03-26 8:47 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] mm/memfd_luo: use i_size_write() to set inode size during retrieve Chenghao Duan
2026-03-26 8:47 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] mm/memfd_luo: fix physical address conversion in put_folios cleanup Chenghao Duan
2026-04-02 1:30 ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-04-02 11:06 ` Pratyush Yadav
2026-04-02 17:43 ` Andrew Morton
2026-03-26 8:47 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] mm/memfd_luo: remove folio from page cache when accounting fails Chenghao Duan
2026-04-02 1:32 ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-04-02 11:52 ` Pratyush Yadav [this message]
2026-04-02 17:54 ` Andrew Morton
2026-04-03 9:07 ` Pratyush Yadav
2026-03-26 8:47 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] mm/memfd_luo: fix integer overflow in memfd_luo_preserve_folios Chenghao Duan
2026-04-02 1:39 ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-04-02 12:06 ` Pratyush Yadav
2026-04-02 17:58 ` Andrew Morton
2026-04-03 9:06 ` Pratyush Yadav
2026-03-26 23:36 ` [PATCH v3 0/7] Modify memfd_luo code Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2vxzzf3lfujq.fsf@kernel.org \
--to=pratyush@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=duanchenghao@kylinos.cn \
--cc=jianghaoran@kylinos.cn \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox