From: Keith Owens <kaos@ocs.com.au>
To: Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au>,
Richard Gooch <rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger@clusterfs.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RAID superblock confusion
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 16:42:20 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3004.1018507340@kao2.melbourne.sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 10 Apr 2002 19:41:11 MST." <20020411024111.GL23513@matchmail.com>
On Wed, 10 Apr 2002 19:41:11 -0700,
Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com> wrote:
>Then you'd just need to make sure that if there are any block modules linked
>into the kernel that raid is also linked into the kernle instead of a module.
>
>Is there some reason why this wouldn't work (except for CML1
>complications...)?
>
>Kieth, will kbuild2.5 affect this in any way? Or is this entirely a CML2
>thing?
AFAICT it is pure config. kbuild 2.5 does not care how .config is
built, it just requires a clean .config. I want a clean seperation
between configuring and building the kernel. In particular, Makefile
rules should not try to adjust for broken config entries, this is a
config only problem.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-04-11 6:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-04-10 15:33 RAID superblock confusion Richard Gooch
2002-04-10 18:40 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-04-10 19:24 ` Richard Gooch
2002-04-10 19:38 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-04-10 20:37 ` Richard Gooch
2002-04-10 21:36 ` Mike Fedyk
2002-04-10 21:39 ` Richard Gooch
2002-04-10 22:09 ` Mike Fedyk
2002-04-10 22:49 ` Richard Gooch
2002-04-10 23:36 ` Mike Fedyk
2002-04-11 10:07 ` Luigi Genoni
2002-04-13 19:29 ` Richard Gooch
2002-04-13 23:55 ` Mike Fedyk
2002-04-14 0:00 ` Richard Gooch
2002-04-14 0:17 ` Mike Fedyk
2002-04-11 1:38 ` Neil Brown
2002-04-11 2:41 ` Mike Fedyk
2002-04-11 6:42 ` Keith Owens [this message]
2002-04-11 8:37 ` Helge Hafting
2002-04-13 19:26 ` Richard Gooch
2002-04-18 1:54 ` Neil Brown
2002-04-18 2:10 ` Mike Fedyk
2002-04-18 2:23 ` Neil Brown
2002-04-18 2:59 ` Mike Fedyk
2002-04-18 14:49 ` Richard Gooch
2002-04-19 13:42 ` Luigi Genoni
2002-04-19 13:48 ` Richard Gooch
2002-04-20 0:50 ` Luigi Genoni
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-04-11 3:18 Neil Brown
2002-04-11 10:19 ` Luigi Genoni
2002-04-11 20:18 ` Mike Fedyk
2002-04-18 3:05 Neil Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3004.1018507340@kao2.melbourne.sgi.com \
--to=kaos@ocs.com.au \
--cc=adilger@clusterfs.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mfedyk@matchmail.com \
--cc=neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au \
--cc=rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox