From: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
To: Tim Kryger <tim.kryger@linaro.org>
Cc: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>,
linux-serial@vger.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Patch Tracking <patches@linaro.org>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>,
Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>,
Lior Amsalem <alior@marvell.com>,
Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
ARM Kernel List <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] serial: 8250_dw: Improve unwritable LCR workaround
Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2013 16:59:16 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3010367.6CxxZ6Dpea@radagast> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAYSxhpR664Od7AaWZrX0rE=iDUHo0h+4=uY=gvkFps4Hz4aew@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2587 bytes --]
On Friday 06 December 2013 16:31:38 Tim Kryger wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 3:51 PM, James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com> wrote:
> > On Friday 06 December 2013 23:29:02 James Hogan wrote:
> >> So it looks like the LCR does always change immediately for me in this
> >> case
> >> (obviously it hasn't hit the BUSY case), but not all the bits can be
> >> written. In particular bit 5 and bit 7 at the least. If I do this (sorry
> >> for whitespace munging):
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_dw.c
> >> b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_dw.c
> >> index 4658e3e..722d448 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_dw.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_dw.c
> >> @@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ static void dw8250_serial_out(struct uart_port *p, int
> >> offset, int value)
> >>
> >> if (offset == UART_LCR) {
> >>
> >> int tries = 1000;
> >> while (tries--) {
> >>
> >> - if (value == p->serial_in(p, UART_LCR))
> >> + if (value & ~0xa0 == p->serial_in(p, UART_LCR) &
> >> ~0xa0)>>
> >> return;
> >>
> >> dw8250_force_idle(p);
> >> writeb(value, p->membase + (UART_LCR <<
> >> p->regshift));
> >>
> >> @@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ static void dw8250_serial_out32(struct uart_port *p,
> >> int offset, int value)
> >>
> >> if (offset == UART_LCR) {
> >>
> >> int tries = 1000;
> >> while (tries--) {
> >>
> >> - if (value == p->serial_in(p, UART_LCR))
> >> + if (value & ~0xa0 == p->serial_in(p, UART_LCR) &
> >> ~0xa0)>
> > My appologies, that should have had some more brackets (I should have
> > retested after cleaning up my debugging). I.e.
> > + if ((value & ~0xa0) == (p->serial_in(p, UART_LCR)
> > & ~0xa0))
> >
> > Cheers
> > James
>
> James,
>
> Thanks for the information. This is really helpful.
>
> You are right about bit 5 being a problem. Its behavior differs
> between IP versions 3.00a and 3.14c per the docs.
>
> As for bit 7, when it doesn't change this indicates the UART was busy
> and we need to do the workaround.
>
> Would you mind testing it again using a mask of ~0x20?
It appears to work with ~0x20 too, and the workaround isn't getting hit (only
tested boot and logging in - nothing fancy). I think having the printks in
this code with the console directed at the serial must have caused
resursion/busy problems somehow.
Cheers
James
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-07 0:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-01 17:18 [PATCH v2] serial: 8250_dw: Improve unwritable LCR workaround Tim Kryger
2013-10-02 9:47 ` Heikki Krogerus
2013-11-26 18:36 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-11-26 23:03 ` Tim Kryger
2013-11-27 18:54 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-11-28 2:46 ` Tim Kryger
2013-11-28 8:30 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-11-28 19:47 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-11-28 19:53 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-12-04 13:01 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-12-04 18:56 ` Tim Kryger
2013-12-06 23:29 ` James Hogan
2013-12-06 23:51 ` James Hogan
2013-12-07 0:31 ` Tim Kryger
2013-12-07 0:59 ` James Hogan [this message]
2013-12-10 0:42 ` Tim Kryger
2013-12-10 12:11 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-12-10 22:48 ` James Hogan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3010367.6CxxZ6Dpea@radagast \
--to=james.hogan@imgtec.com \
--cc=alior@marvell.com \
--cc=ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=gregory.clement@free-electrons.com \
--cc=heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patches@linaro.org \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=tim.kryger@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox