From: "Daniel Blueman" <daniel.blueman@gmx.net>
To: Timothy Miller <miller@techsource.com>
Cc: aradford@3WARE.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: File system performance, hardware performance, ext3, 3ware RA ID1, etc.
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 17:25:52 +0100 (MET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <30156.1076775952@www12.gmx.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 402D6354.3010801@techsource.com
Tim,
Do you get the same numbers (but slightly higher, as this is will measure
from a smaller portion of outer zones) with:
# hdparm -t /dev/sda
?
> Adam Radford wrote:
> > Perhaps you are issuing non purely sequential IO. The card firmware
> does
> > some
> > reodering, but at some point it will cause performance degradation. Can
> you
> > try
> > kernel 2.6 w/xfs?
>
> Not any time soon, but as I mentioned earlier, I measured 13.9 megs/sec
> when I ran this command:
>
> time dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sda2 bs=1024k count=1024
>
> No file system was involved; I was simply writing zeros to the block
> device (swap partition with swap off). It took 73.522 seconds to do the
> above operation. Also, I was running in single-user mode while doing
> the test.
>
> >
> > Also, in my experience, the 'raw io' interface doesn't issue any
> > asynchronous IO. The
> > card _definately_ needs asynchronous IO posted to it or you will not get
> > good results
> > because you won't get all the drives busy.
>
> With RAID1, both drives will be written with the same data. There is no
> need to be asynchronous, since it's all completely linear and sequential
> with large data blocks.
--
Daniel J Blueman
GMX ProMail (250 MB Mailbox, 50 FreeSMS, Virenschutz, 2,99 EUR/Monat...)
jetzt 3 Monate GRATIS + 3x DER SPIEGEL +++ http://www.gmx.net/derspiegel +++
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-14 16:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-13 23:07 File system performance, hardware performance, ext3, 3ware RA ID1, etc Adam Radford
2004-02-13 23:52 ` Timothy Miller
2004-02-14 16:25 ` Daniel Blueman [this message]
2004-02-16 17:18 ` Timothy Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=30156.1076775952@www12.gmx.net \
--to=daniel.blueman@gmx.net \
--cc=aradford@3WARE.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miller@techsource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox