From: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.0-test4-mm1
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 16:10:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <30190000.1061853042@flay> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030824171318.4acf1182.akpm@osdl.org>
System time is still rather higher in kernbench, though maybe the
elapsed time isn't degraded so much any more. Not sure if this is
scheduler changes or not, but last time, we isolated a change of
exactly this magnitude to one of those patches (Ingo's IIRC).
I tried "set TIMESLICE_GRANULARITY to MAX_TIMESLICE in sched.c" as
requested, makes no difference really (-max result below).
Kernbench: (make -j vmlinux, maximal tasks)
Elapsed System User CPU
2.6.0-test4 45.87 116.92 571.10 1499.00
2.6.0-test4-mm1 46.29 121.39 570.52 1494.75
2.6.0-test4-mm1-max 46.00 122.18 570.73 1505.75
diffprofile:
7763 4.8% total
2921 6.4% default_idle
949 0.0% direct_strnlen_user
719 20.6% __copy_from_user_ll
554 10.4% __copy_to_user_ll
544 33.5% kmem_cache_free
425 0.0% kpmd_ctor
372 26.1% schedule
349 18.7% atomic_dec_and_lock
322 4.1% __d_lookup
318 8.6% find_get_page
283 165.5% may_open
279 1.2% page_remove_rmap
275 16.0% buffered_rmqueue
263 42.4% __wake_up
212 15.3% free_hot_cold_page
119 6.4% path_lookup
117 3.7% zap_pte_range
114 0.0% direct_strncpy_from_user
107 17.3% generic_file_open
...
-102 -1.6% page_add_rmap
-122 -100.0% strncpy_from_user
-288 -79.8% dentry_open
-305 -66.2% do_page_cache_readahead
-353 -100.0% pgd_ctor
-447 -80.4% file_ra_state_init
-558 -74.9% filp_close
-854 -100.0% strnlen_user
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-08-25 23:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-08-25 0:13 2.6.0-test4-mm1 Andrew Morton
2003-08-25 6:16 ` pcnet32 oops patches (was Re: 2.6.0-test4-mm1) Barry K. Nathan
2003-08-25 11:00 ` Domen Puncer
2003-08-25 17:30 ` 2.6.0-test4-mm1: wl3501_cs.c doesn't compile Adrian Bunk
2003-08-25 17:46 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2003-08-25 18:24 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2003-08-25 18:39 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2003-08-25 22:01 ` Adrian Bunk
2003-08-26 15:22 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2003-08-25 19:37 ` [BUG] 2.6.0-test4-mm1: NFS+XFS=data corruption Barry K. Nathan
2003-08-25 19:45 ` Andrew Morton
2003-08-25 22:54 ` Steve Lord
2003-08-26 10:14 ` Andrew Morton
2003-08-26 11:01 ` Suparna Bhattacharya
2003-08-26 17:44 ` Andrew Morton
2003-08-26 17:57 ` Steve Lord
2003-08-26 18:34 ` Andrew Morton
2003-08-25 23:10 ` Martin J. Bligh [this message]
2003-08-26 10:08 ` 2.6.0-test4-mm1 William Lee Irwin III
2003-08-26 14:23 ` 2.6.0-test4-mm1 Martin J. Bligh
2003-08-26 14:32 ` 2.6.0-test4-mm1 William Lee Irwin III
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=30190000.1061853042@flay \
--to=mbligh@aracnet.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox