From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757188AbXKGQes (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Nov 2007 11:34:48 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753750AbXKGQem (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Nov 2007 11:34:42 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:52960 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753486AbXKGQel (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Nov 2007 11:34:41 -0500 Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: <1194448467.3140.6.camel@albrecht.rdi1.com> References: <1194448467.3140.6.camel@albrecht.rdi1.com> <1194445911.2705.2.camel@albrecht.rdi1.com> <200711070644.lA76iodZ005491@agora.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu> <30212.1194447844@redhat.com> To: Paul Albrecht Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Erez Zadok , akpm@linux-foundation.org, unionfs@filesystems.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [Unionfs] Re: [PATCH] IGET: Stop UnionFS from using iget() and read_inode() X-Mailer: MH-E 8.0.3+cvs; nmh 1.2-20070115cvs; GNU Emacs 23.0.50 Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2007 16:34:27 +0000 Message-ID: <30403.1194453267@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Paul Albrecht wrote: > Without ... what's the difference? I asked a specific question about the > test set that was used to validate unionfs and your fix. I was just checking it wasn't something my patch introduced. David