From: Hanna Linder <hannal@us.ibm.com>
To: Jon Tollefson <kniht@us.ibm.com>, "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>
Cc: Hanna Linder <hannal@us.ibm.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Dedicated kernel bug database
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2002 13:58:23 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <30470000.1041285502@w-hlinder> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1040441244.15770.151.camel@mac.magnaspeed.net>
--On Friday, December 20, 2002 09:27:24 PM -0600 Jon Tollefson <kniht@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 20:52, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
>> Only the owner of the bug (or an admin) can change that, I think.
>> However, as you file the bug, you could change the default owner
>> to yourself, which would fix it. I'll fix this one for you.
>> > --On Thursday, December 19, 2002 05:39:56 PM -0800 "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> People should move it to "ASSIGNED" if they're working on it.
>
> The way it is setup now is that mostly only component owners can move a
> bug to the assigned state. A submitter of a bug and the owner of a bug
> can change any other aspect of the bugs that they submit or own
> respectively. And anyone can submit comments to any bug.
Jon and Martin,
You seem to be saying different things. If the submitter wants
to take the bug they need to be able to change the status to ASSIGNED.
But according to Jon (and my experience) I was not able to change the
status or take a bug (although I could change the owner).
Is it possible to make it so an owner can change the status?
If not you should change the FAQ to describe the procedure for
letting people know you are working on a bug.
Thanks.
Hanna
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-12-30 21:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 74+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-12-19 13:35 Dedicated kernel bug database John Bradford
2002-12-19 17:33 ` Brian Jackson
2002-12-20 3:26 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-12-19 17:48 ` Eli Carter
2002-12-19 18:49 ` Dave Jones
2002-12-19 19:49 ` Eli Carter
2002-12-19 20:12 ` John Bradford
2002-12-19 20:24 ` Eli Carter
2002-12-19 20:45 ` John Bradford
2002-12-19 19:52 ` John Bradford
2002-12-19 20:18 ` Dave Jones
2002-12-19 20:32 ` Randy.Dunlap
2002-12-19 20:42 ` John Bradford
2002-12-20 3:40 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-12-20 9:48 ` John Bradford
2002-12-20 10:40 ` Dave Jones
2002-12-20 16:08 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-12-20 3:35 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-12-20 17:32 ` Jon Tollefson
2002-12-19 20:09 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-12-19 20:32 ` John Bradford
2002-12-19 21:11 ` Stephen Wille Padnos
2002-12-19 21:40 ` John Bradford
2002-12-19 21:32 ` Randy.Dunlap
2002-12-19 21:55 ` John Bradford
2002-12-19 21:57 ` Eli Carter
2002-12-19 21:55 ` Randy.Dunlap
2002-12-19 22:45 ` Hanna Linder
2002-12-20 1:39 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-12-20 2:01 ` Hanna Linder
2002-12-20 2:20 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-12-20 15:09 ` Jon Tollefson
2002-12-20 23:52 ` Hanna Linder
2002-12-21 3:30 ` Jon Tollefson
2002-12-20 10:35 ` Dave Jones
2002-12-20 19:37 ` Hanna Linder
2002-12-20 2:10 ` Hanna Linder
2002-12-20 2:22 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-12-20 2:58 ` Randy.Dunlap
2002-12-20 3:21 ` Martin J. Bligh
[not found] ` <31080000.1040418947@w-hlinder>
2002-12-20 21:43 ` Dedicated kernel bug database + documentaion Hanna Linder
2002-12-20 21:59 ` Randy.Dunlap
2002-12-20 22:01 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-12-20 21:59 ` Eli Carter
2002-12-21 2:52 ` Dedicated kernel bug database Martin J. Bligh
2002-12-21 3:27 ` Jon Tollefson
2002-12-30 21:58 ` Hanna Linder [this message]
[not found] ` <mailman.1040338801.24520.linux-kernel2news@redhat.com>
2002-12-19 23:59 ` Pete Zaitcev
2002-12-20 0:19 ` Hanna Linder
2002-12-20 0:24 ` Pete Zaitcev
2002-12-20 1:01 ` Hanna Linder
2002-12-20 10:32 ` Dave Jones
2002-12-20 10:41 ` Russell King
2002-12-20 10:30 ` Dave Jones
2002-12-20 15:43 ` Eli Carter
2002-12-19 22:23 ` Stephen Wille Padnos
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-12-19 17:46 Dan Kegel
2002-12-19 18:00 ` John Bradford
2002-12-19 18:08 ` Eli Carter
2002-12-19 20:08 ` John Bradford
2002-12-19 20:38 ` Eli Carter
2002-12-19 20:59 ` John Bradford
2002-12-19 21:14 ` Eli Carter
2002-12-20 14:23 ` Horst von Brand
2002-12-19 22:05 ` Dan Kegel
2002-12-19 22:26 ` Dan Kegel
2002-12-19 23:09 ` John Bradford
[not found] <2CC936747EA1284DA378A18D730697420158A50E@exchacad.ms.gettysburg.edu>
2002-12-19 20:33 ` Justin Pryzby
2002-12-19 21:04 Heater, Daniel (IndSys, GEFanuc, VMIC)
2002-12-20 2:26 Dan Kegel
2002-12-20 11:18 Nicolas Mailhot
2002-12-22 2:50 Hell.Surfers
2002-12-22 9:16 ` John Bradford
2002-12-22 18:53 Adam J. Richter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=30470000.1041285502@w-hlinder \
--to=hannal@us.ibm.com \
--cc=kniht@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbligh@aracnet.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox