public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* 2.6.10-rc[2|3] protection fault on /proc/devices
@ 2004-12-06 23:11 Georg Schild
  2004-12-07  7:40 ` Andrew Morton
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Georg Schild @ 2004-12-06 23:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel

Since 2.6.10-rc2 I am having problems accessing /proc/devices. On 
startup some init-skripts access this node and print out a protection 
fault. i am having this on pcmcia and swap startup. My system is an 
amd64 @3000+ in an Acer Aspire 1501Lmi at 64bit mode running gentoo. 
.config is the same as on 2.6.10-rc1 which works good. cat on 
/proc/devices gives the same problems. The kernel has just a patch for 
wbsd (builtin mmc-cardreader) from Pierre Ossman in use, everything else 
is vanilla. Does anyone know of this issue and perhaps on how to solve this?

Regards

Georg Schild

> kjournald starting.  Commit interval 5 seconds
> EXT3 FS on hda10, internal journal
> EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode.
> kjournald starting.  Commit interval 5 seconds
> EXT3 FS on hda11, internal journal
> EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode.
> general protection fault: 0000 [1]
> CPU 0
> Modules linked in:
> Pid: 5693, comm: grep Not tainted 2.6.10-rc3
> RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff8028c5b5>] <ffffffff8028c5b5>{get_blkdev_list+85}
> RSP: 0018:000001001eec1e48  EFLAGS: 00010202
> RAX: 000000000000000c RBX: 6d736f2d636f7270 RCX: 0000000000000000
> RDX: ffffffff804332e2 RSI: fffffffffffffffe RDI: ffffffff804332e2
> RBP: 0000000000000048 R08: 00000000ffffffff R09: 0000000000000009
> R10: 00000000ffffffff R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 000001001f248139
> R13: 000000000000000b R14: 0000000000000c00 R15: 0000000000000000
> FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffffffff805f71c0(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
> CR2: 0000002a95725f60 CR3: 0000000000101000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
> Process grep (pid: 5693, threadinfo 000001001eec0000, task 000001001e80f0b0)
> Stack: 0000000000000003 0000000000000139 000001001eec1ed8 000001001f248000
>        000001001eec1ed4 ffffffff80186903 000001001ec4be80 0000000000000000
>        000001001f248000 0000000000000c00
> Call Trace:<ffffffff80186903>{devices_read_proc+67} <ffffffff801841ba>{proc_file_read+234}
>        <ffffffff80158ac7>{vfs_read+199} <ffffffff80158d73>{sys_read+83}
>        <ffffffff8010e12a>{system_call+126}
> 
> Code: 8b 53 08 48 8d 4b 0c 48 63 fd 4c 01 e7 48 c7 c6 db 32 43 80
> RIP <ffffffff8028c5b5>{get_blkdev_list+85} RSP <000001001eec1e48>
>  <0>general protection fault: 0000 [2]
> CPU 0
> Modules linked in:
> Pid: 12088, comm: cardmgr Not tainted 2.6.10-rc3
> RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff8028c5b5>] <ffffffff8028c5b5>{get_blkdev_list+85}
> RSP: 0018:000001001ef97e48  EFLAGS: 00010202
> RAX: 000000000000000c RBX: 6d736f2d636f7270 RCX: 0000000000000000
> RDX: ffffffff804332e2 RSI: fffffffffffffffe RDI: ffffffff804332e2
> RBP: 0000000000000048 R08: 00000000ffffffff R09: 0000000000000009
> R10: 00000000ffffffff R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 000001001ea9f139
> R13: 000000000000000b R14: 0000000000000400 R15: 0000000000000000
> FS:  0000000000519ae0(0000) GS:ffffffff805f71c0(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
> CR2: 0000002a956cb5c0 CR3: 0000000000101000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
> Process cardmgr (pid: 12088, threadinfo 000001001ef96000, task 000001001f2ac910)
> Stack: 0000000000100073 0000000000000139 000001001ef97ed8 000001001ea9f000
>        000001001ef97ed4 ffffffff80186903 000001001e12f480 0000000000000000
>        000001001ea9f000 0000000000000400
> Call Trace:<ffffffff80186903>{devices_read_proc+67} <ffffffff801841ba>{proc_file_read+234}
>        <ffffffff80158ac7>{vfs_read+199} <ffffffff80158d73>{sys_read+83}
>        <ffffffff8010e12a>{system_call+126}
> 
> Code: 8b 53 08 48 8d 4b 0c 48 63 fd 4c 01 e7 48 c7 c6 db 32 43 80
> RIP <ffffffff8028c5b5>{get_blkdev_list+85} RSP <000001001ef97e48>
>  <6>tg3: eth0: Link is up at 100 Mbps, full duplex.
> tg3: eth0: Flow control is on for TX and on for RX.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: 2.6.10-rc[2|3] protection fault on /proc/devices
  2004-12-06 23:11 2.6.10-rc[2|3] protection fault on /proc/devices Georg Schild
@ 2004-12-07  7:40 ` Andrew Morton
  2004-12-07  7:50   ` Georg Schild
                     ` (3 more replies)
  0 siblings, 4 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2004-12-07  7:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Georg Schild; +Cc: linux-kernel

Georg Schild <dangertools@gmx.net> wrote:
>
> Since 2.6.10-rc2 I am having problems accessing /proc/devices. On 
> startup some init-skripts access this node and print out a protection 
> fault. i am having this on pcmcia and swap startup. My system is an 
> amd64 @3000+ in an Acer Aspire 1501Lmi at 64bit mode running gentoo. 
> .config is the same as on 2.6.10-rc1 which works good. cat on 
> /proc/devices gives the same problems. The kernel has just a patch for 
> wbsd (builtin mmc-cardreader) from Pierre Ossman in use, everything else 
> is vanilla. Does anyone know of this issue and perhaps on how to solve this?
> 
> Regards
> 
> Georg Schild
> 
> > kjournald starting.  Commit interval 5 seconds
> > EXT3 FS on hda10, internal journal
> > EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode.
> > kjournald starting.  Commit interval 5 seconds
> > EXT3 FS on hda11, internal journal
> > EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode.
> > general protection fault: 0000 [1]
> > CPU 0
> > Modules linked in:
> > Pid: 5693, comm: grep Not tainted 2.6.10-rc3
> > RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff8028c5b5>] <ffffffff8028c5b5>{get_blkdev_list+85}
> > RSP: 0018:000001001eec1e48  EFLAGS: 00010202
> > RAX: 000000000000000c RBX: 6d736f2d636f7270 RCX: 0000000000000000
> > RDX: ffffffff804332e2 RSI: fffffffffffffffe RDI: ffffffff804332e2
> > RBP: 0000000000000048 R08: 00000000ffffffff R09: 0000000000000009
> > R10: 00000000ffffffff R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 000001001f248139
> > R13: 000000000000000b R14: 0000000000000c00 R15: 0000000000000000
> > FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffffffff805f71c0(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> > CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
> > CR2: 0000002a95725f60 CR3: 0000000000101000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
> > Process grep (pid: 5693, threadinfo 000001001eec0000, task 000001001e80f0b0)
> > Stack: 0000000000000003 0000000000000139 000001001eec1ed8 000001001f248000
> >        000001001eec1ed4 ffffffff80186903 000001001ec4be80 0000000000000000
> >        000001001f248000 0000000000000c00
> > Call Trace:<ffffffff80186903>{devices_read_proc+67} <ffffffff801841ba>{proc_file_read+234}
> >        <ffffffff80158ac7>{vfs_read+199} <ffffffff80158d73>{sys_read+83}
> >        <ffffffff8010e12a>{system_call+126}
> > 
> > Code: 8b 53 08 48 8d 4b 0c 48 63 fd 4c 01 e7 48 c7 c6 db 32 43 80

How odd.  All I can think is that something has registered a zillion
devices and get_blkdev_list() has run off the /proc page.  But then, it
should have oopsed in sprintf()..

Still.  Please send a copy of your /proc/devices from 2.6.10-rc1 and also
apply this:

--- 25/drivers/block/genhd.c~a	2004-12-06 23:31:13.677476528 -0800
+++ 25-akpm/drivers/block/genhd.c	2004-12-06 23:31:30.539913048 -0800
@@ -48,9 +48,11 @@ int get_blkdev_list(char *p)
 
 	down_read(&block_subsys.rwsem);
 	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(major_names); i++) {
-		for (n = major_names[i]; n; n = n->next)
-			len += sprintf(p+len, "%3d %s\n",
+		for (n = major_names[i]; n; n = n->next) {
+			if (len < PAGE_SIZE / 2)
+				len += sprintf(p+len, "%3d %s\n",
 				       n->major, n->name);
+		}
 	}
 	up_read(&block_subsys.rwsem);
 
_

to 2.6.10-rc3 and see if that fixes it.  If so, please send the
/proc/devices content from this kernel.

Beyond that, perhaps something scribbled on the data structures in there. 
Setting CONFIG_SLAB_DEBUG and/or CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC might turn
something up.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: 2.6.10-rc[2|3] protection fault on /proc/devices
  2004-12-07  7:40 ` Andrew Morton
@ 2004-12-07  7:50   ` Georg Schild
  2004-12-07  8:31   ` Georg Schild
                     ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Georg Schild @ 2004-12-07  7:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel

Andrew Morton wrote:
> Georg Schild <dangertools@gmx.net> wrote:
> 
>>Since 2.6.10-rc2 I am having problems accessing /proc/devices. On 
>>startup some init-skripts access this node and print out a protection 
>>fault. i am having this on pcmcia and swap startup. My system is an 
>>amd64 @3000+ in an Acer Aspire 1501Lmi at 64bit mode running gentoo. 
>>.config is the same as on 2.6.10-rc1 which works good. cat on 
>>/proc/devices gives the same problems. The kernel has just a patch for 
>>wbsd (builtin mmc-cardreader) from Pierre Ossman in use, everything else 
>>is vanilla. Does anyone know of this issue and perhaps on how to solve this?
>>
>>Regards
>>
>>Georg Schild
>>
>>
> 
> 
> How odd.  All I can think is that something has registered a zillion
> devices and get_blkdev_list() has run off the /proc page.  But then, it
> should have oopsed in sprintf()..
> 
> Still.  Please send a copy of your /proc/devices from 2.6.10-rc1 and also
> apply this:
> 
> --- 25/drivers/block/genhd.c~a	2004-12-06 23:31:13.677476528 -0800
> +++ 25-akpm/drivers/block/genhd.c	2004-12-06 23:31:30.539913048 -0800
> @@ -48,9 +48,11 @@ int get_blkdev_list(char *p)
>  
>  	down_read(&block_subsys.rwsem);
>  	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(major_names); i++) {
> -		for (n = major_names[i]; n; n = n->next)
> -			len += sprintf(p+len, "%3d %s\n",
> +		for (n = major_names[i]; n; n = n->next) {
> +			if (len < PAGE_SIZE / 2)
> +				len += sprintf(p+len, "%3d %s\n",
>  				       n->major, n->name);
> +		}
>  	}
>  	up_read(&block_subsys.rwsem);
>  
> _
> 
> to 2.6.10-rc3 and see if that fixes it.  If so, please send the
> /proc/devices content from this kernel.
> 
> Beyond that, perhaps something scribbled on the data structures in there. 
> Setting CONFIG_SLAB_DEBUG and/or CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC might turn
> something up.

Okay, here the output of /proc/devices on 2.6.10-rc1. I will apply the 
patch and see if it works.

regards

Georg Schild

> Character devices:
>   1 mem
>   2 pty
>   3 ttyp
>   4 /dev/vc/0
>   4 tty
>   4 ttyS
>   5 /dev/tty
>   5 /dev/console
>   5 /dev/ptmx
>   6 lp
>   7 vcs
>  10 misc
>  13 input
>  14 sound
>  21 sg
>  29 fb
>  81 video4linux
>  89 i2c
> 116 alsa
> 128 ptm
> 136 pts
> 161 ircomm
> 162 raw
> 171 ieee1394
> 180 usb
> 202 cpu/msr
> 203 cpu/cpuid
> 216 rfcomm
> 253 devfs
> 254 pcmcia
> 
> Block devices:
>   2 fd
>   3 ide0
>   7 loop
>   8 sd
>  11 sr
>  22 ide1
>  43 nbd
>  65 sd
>  66 sd
>  67 sd
>  68 sd
>  69 sd
>  70 sd
>  71 sd
>  80 i2o_block
> 125 ub
> 128 sd
> 129 sd
> 130 sd
> 131 sd
> 132 sd
> 133 sd
> 134 sd
> 135 sd
> 254 mmc


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: 2.6.10-rc[2|3] protection fault on /proc/devices
  2004-12-07  7:40 ` Andrew Morton
  2004-12-07  7:50   ` Georg Schild
@ 2004-12-07  8:31   ` Georg Schild
  2004-12-07  9:05     ` Andrew Morton
  2004-12-07  9:02   ` Georg Schild
  2004-12-07 15:29   ` George Alexandru Dragoi
  3 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Georg Schild @ 2004-12-07  8:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel

Andrew Morton wrote:
> Georg Schild <dangertools@gmx.net> wrote:
> 
>>Since 2.6.10-rc2 I am having problems accessing /proc/devices. On 
>>startup some init-skripts access this node and print out a protection 
>>fault. i am having this on pcmcia and swap startup. My system is an 
>>amd64 @3000+ in an Acer Aspire 1501Lmi at 64bit mode running gentoo. 
>>.config is the same as on 2.6.10-rc1 which works good. cat on 
>>/proc/devices gives the same problems. The kernel has just a patch for 
>>wbsd (builtin mmc-cardreader) from Pierre Ossman in use, everything else 
>>is vanilla. Does anyone know of this issue and perhaps on how to solve this?
 >>
 >>
> How odd.  All I can think is that something has registered a zillion
> devices and get_blkdev_list() has run off the /proc page.  But then, it
> should have oopsed in sprintf()..
> 
> Still.  Please send a copy of your /proc/devices from 2.6.10-rc1 and also
> apply this:
>
> to 2.6.10-rc3 and see if that fixes it.  If so, please send the
> /proc/devices content from this kernel.
> 
> Beyond that, perhaps something scribbled on the data structures in there. 
> Setting CONFIG_SLAB_DEBUG and/or CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC might turn
> something up.

I have tried now with applied patch against the vanilla-sources, that 
means without the wbsd-patch, nothing changed. same is with the 
wbsd-patch. i did a complete rebuild (make clean etc.) everytime. How 
can i enable some debugging?


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: 2.6.10-rc[2|3] protection fault on /proc/devices
  2004-12-07  7:40 ` Andrew Morton
  2004-12-07  7:50   ` Georg Schild
  2004-12-07  8:31   ` Georg Schild
@ 2004-12-07  9:02   ` Georg Schild
  2004-12-07 15:29   ` George Alexandru Dragoi
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Georg Schild @ 2004-12-07  9:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel

Andrew Morton wrote:
> Georg Schild <dangertools@gmx.net> wrote:
> 
>>Since 2.6.10-rc2 I am having problems accessing /proc/devices. On 
>>startup some init-skripts access this node and print out a protection 
>>fault. i am having this on pcmcia and swap startup. My system is an 
>>amd64 @3000+ in an Acer Aspire 1501Lmi at 64bit mode running gentoo. 
>>.config is the same as on 2.6.10-rc1 which works good. cat on 
>>/proc/devices gives the same problems. The kernel has just a patch for 
>>wbsd (builtin mmc-cardreader) from Pierre Ossman in use, everything else 
>>is vanilla. Does anyone know of this issue and perhaps on how to solve this?
>>
> Beyond that, perhaps something scribbled on the data structures in there. 
> Setting CONFIG_SLAB_DEBUG and/or CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC might turn
> something up.

I don't know what caused the kernel to give up baging me but it did. I 
enabled CONFIG_DEBUG_SLAB and CONFIG_KERNEL_DEBUG and now everything 
works okay. I have inserted the patch you gave me and the wbsd-patch is 
inserted too, everything works now, don't know why, i can cat 
/proc/devices too. Loading modules is not a problem too.

> cat /proc/devices
> Character devices:
>   1 mem
>   2 pty
>   3 ttyp
>   4 /dev/vc/0
>   4 tty
>   4 ttyS
>   5 /dev/tty
>   5 /dev/console
>   5 /dev/ptmx
>   6 lp
>   7 vcs
>  10 misc
>  13 input
>  14 sound
>  21 sg
>  29 fb
>  81 video4linux
>  89 i2c
> 116 alsa
> 128 ptm
> 136 pts
> 161 ircomm
> 162 raw
> 171 ieee1394
> 180 usb
> 202 cpu/msr
> 203 cpu/cpuid
> 216 rfcomm
> 253 devfs
> 254 pcmcia
> 
> Block devices:
>   2 fd
>   3 ide0
>   7 loop
>   8 sd
>  11 sr
>  22 ide1
>  43 nbd
>  65 sd
>  66 sd
>  67 sd
>  68 sd
>  69 sd
>  70 sd
>  71 sd
>  80 i2o_block
> 128 sd
> 129 sd
> 130 sd
> 131 sd
> 132 sd
> 133 sd
> 134 sd
> 135 sd
> 180 ub
> 254 mmc


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: 2.6.10-rc[2|3] protection fault on /proc/devices
  2004-12-07  8:31   ` Georg Schild
@ 2004-12-07  9:05     ` Andrew Morton
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2004-12-07  9:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Georg Schild; +Cc: linux-kernel


(Please don't edit the email headers - just do reply-to-all)

Georg Schild <dangertools@gmx.net> wrote:
>
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Georg Schild <dangertools@gmx.net> wrote:
> > 
> >>Since 2.6.10-rc2 I am having problems accessing /proc/devices. On 
> >>startup some init-skripts access this node and print out a protection 
> >>fault. i am having this on pcmcia and swap startup. My system is an 
> >>amd64 @3000+ in an Acer Aspire 1501Lmi at 64bit mode running gentoo. 
> >>.config is the same as on 2.6.10-rc1 which works good. cat on 
> >>/proc/devices gives the same problems. The kernel has just a patch for 
> >>wbsd (builtin mmc-cardreader) from Pierre Ossman in use, everything else 
> >>is vanilla. Does anyone know of this issue and perhaps on how to solve this?
>  >>
>  >>
> > How odd.  All I can think is that something has registered a zillion
> > devices and get_blkdev_list() has run off the /proc page.  But then, it
> > should have oopsed in sprintf()..
> > 
> > Still.  Please send a copy of your /proc/devices from 2.6.10-rc1 and also
> > apply this:
> >
> > to 2.6.10-rc3 and see if that fixes it.  If so, please send the
> > /proc/devices content from this kernel.
> > 
> > Beyond that, perhaps something scribbled on the data structures in there. 
> > Setting CONFIG_SLAB_DEBUG and/or CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC might turn
> > something up.
> 
> I have tried now with applied patch against the vanilla-sources, that 
> means without the wbsd-patch, nothing changed. same is with the 
> wbsd-patch. i did a complete rebuild (make clean etc.) everytime. How 
> can i enable some debugging?
> 

make menuconfig
-> Kernel Hacking
  -> enable Debug memory allocations

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: 2.6.10-rc[2|3] protection fault on /proc/devices
  2004-12-07  7:40 ` Andrew Morton
                     ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2004-12-07  9:02   ` Georg Schild
@ 2004-12-07 15:29   ` George Alexandru Dragoi
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: George Alexandru Dragoi @ 2004-12-07 15:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: Georg Schild, linux-kernel

Hello, 

I have some similar problem. I use 2.6.10-rc2-mm3 kernel. For some
reason i can't read /proc/modules

31222 ?        D      0:00 lsmod
31243 ?        D      0:00 cat /proc/modules

This is what remained in memory after i tryed to see modules list. I
also had some problem with this kernel after i loaded iptables_nat,
and unload it and also unload the ip_conntrack module and after that i
got some OOPS, and then a nice panic. I mailed after that to this
list.


On Mon, 6 Dec 2004 23:40:44 -0800, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> wrote:
> Georg Schild <dangertools@gmx.net> wrote:
> 
> 
> >
> > Since 2.6.10-rc2 I am having problems accessing /proc/devices. On
> > startup some init-skripts access this node and print out a protection
> > fault. i am having this on pcmcia and swap startup. My system is an
> > amd64 @3000+ in an Acer Aspire 1501Lmi at 64bit mode running gentoo.
> > .config is the same as on 2.6.10-rc1 which works good. cat on
> > /proc/devices gives the same problems. The kernel has just a patch for
> > wbsd (builtin mmc-cardreader) from Pierre Ossman in use, everything else
> > is vanilla. Does anyone know of this issue and perhaps on how to solve this?
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Georg Schild
> >
> > > kjournald starting.  Commit interval 5 seconds
> > > EXT3 FS on hda10, internal journal
> > > EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode.
> > > kjournald starting.  Commit interval 5 seconds
> > > EXT3 FS on hda11, internal journal
> > > EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode.
> > > general protection fault: 0000 [1]
> > > CPU 0
> > > Modules linked in:
> > > Pid: 5693, comm: grep Not tainted 2.6.10-rc3
> > > RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff8028c5b5>] <ffffffff8028c5b5>{get_blkdev_list+85}
> > > RSP: 0018:000001001eec1e48  EFLAGS: 00010202
> > > RAX: 000000000000000c RBX: 6d736f2d636f7270 RCX: 0000000000000000
> > > RDX: ffffffff804332e2 RSI: fffffffffffffffe RDI: ffffffff804332e2
> > > RBP: 0000000000000048 R08: 00000000ffffffff R09: 0000000000000009
> > > R10: 00000000ffffffff R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 000001001f248139
> > > R13: 000000000000000b R14: 0000000000000c00 R15: 0000000000000000
> > > FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffffffff805f71c0(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> > > CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
> > > CR2: 0000002a95725f60 CR3: 0000000000101000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
> > > Process grep (pid: 5693, threadinfo 000001001eec0000, task 000001001e80f0b0)
> > > Stack: 0000000000000003 0000000000000139 000001001eec1ed8 000001001f248000
> > >        000001001eec1ed4 ffffffff80186903 000001001ec4be80 0000000000000000
> > >        000001001f248000 0000000000000c00
> > > Call Trace:<ffffffff80186903>{devices_read_proc+67} <ffffffff801841ba>{proc_file_read+234}
> > >        <ffffffff80158ac7>{vfs_read+199} <ffffffff80158d73>{sys_read+83}
> > >        <ffffffff8010e12a>{system_call+126}
> > >
> > > Code: 8b 53 08 48 8d 4b 0c 48 63 fd 4c 01 e7 48 c7 c6 db 32 43 80
> 
> How odd.  All I can think is that something has registered a zillion
> devices and get_blkdev_list() has run off the /proc page.  But then, it
> should have oopsed in sprintf()..
> 
> Still.  Please send a copy of your /proc/devices from 2.6.10-rc1 and also
> apply this:
> 
> --- 25/drivers/block/genhd.c~a  2004-12-06 23:31:13.677476528 -0800
> +++ 25-akpm/drivers/block/genhd.c       2004-12-06 23:31:30.539913048 -0800
> @@ -48,9 +48,11 @@ int get_blkdev_list(char *p)
> 
>         down_read(&block_subsys.rwsem);
>         for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(major_names); i++) {
> -               for (n = major_names[i]; n; n = n->next)
> -                       len += sprintf(p+len, "%3d %s\n",
> +               for (n = major_names[i]; n; n = n->next) {
> +                       if (len < PAGE_SIZE / 2)
> +                               len += sprintf(p+len, "%3d %s\n",
>                                        n->major, n->name);
> +               }
>         }
>         up_read(&block_subsys.rwsem);
> 
> _
> 
> to 2.6.10-rc3 and see if that fixes it.  If so, please send the
> /proc/devices content from this kernel.
> 
> Beyond that, perhaps something scribbled on the data structures in there.
> Setting CONFIG_SLAB_DEBUG and/or CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC might turn
> something up.
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> 


-- 
Bla bla

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2004-12-07 15:29 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-12-06 23:11 2.6.10-rc[2|3] protection fault on /proc/devices Georg Schild
2004-12-07  7:40 ` Andrew Morton
2004-12-07  7:50   ` Georg Schild
2004-12-07  8:31   ` Georg Schild
2004-12-07  9:05     ` Andrew Morton
2004-12-07  9:02   ` Georg Schild
2004-12-07 15:29   ` George Alexandru Dragoi

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox