From: corbet@lwn.net (Jonathan Corbet)
To: "Mike Frysinger" <vapier.adi@gmail.com>
Cc: "Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@lwn.net>,
"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@elte.hu>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Alan Cox" <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
"Alexander Viro" <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>,
"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3, RFC] misc char dev BKL pushdown
Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 18:21:16 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <30821.1211242876@vena.lwn.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 19 May 2008 20:07:59 EDT." <8bd0f97a0805191707k597e4f48i9c54488777fdd91b@mail.gmail.com>
Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@gmail.com> wrote:
> this open func already has a spinlock protecting it. doesnt that mean
> we dont need the bkl in it ?
The existence of a spinlock is a good sign. But, until somebody has
looked at the code and verified that said lock is really protecting
everything, it's best to leave the BKL protection (which has always been
there, just at a higher level) in place.
jon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-20 0:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 78+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-14 17:49 [announce] "kill the Big Kernel Lock (BKL)" tree Ingo Molnar
2008-05-14 18:30 ` Andi Kleen
2008-05-14 21:00 ` Alan Cox
2008-05-14 21:13 ` Andi Kleen
2008-05-14 21:16 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-05-14 21:17 ` Alan Cox
2008-05-14 21:19 ` Alan Cox
2008-05-14 21:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-05-14 22:03 ` Andi Kleen
2008-05-15 13:34 ` Alan Cox
2008-05-15 14:27 ` Andi Kleen
2008-05-15 15:36 ` Alan Cox
2008-05-16 10:21 ` Andi Kleen
2008-05-15 8:02 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-05-14 18:41 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-05-14 19:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-05-14 20:05 ` Frederik Deweerdt
2008-05-14 21:45 ` Jonathan Corbet
2008-05-14 21:39 ` Alan Cox
2008-05-14 21:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-05-14 22:07 ` Jonathan Corbet
2008-05-14 22:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-05-22 20:20 ` Alan Cox
2008-05-16 15:44 ` [PATCH, RFC] char dev BKL pushdown Jonathan Corbet
2008-05-16 15:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-05-16 16:03 ` [PATCH] kill empty chardev open/release methods Christoph Hellwig
2008-05-16 16:24 ` Alan Cox
2008-05-16 20:55 ` Alan Cox
2008-05-18 19:46 ` Jonathan Corbet
2008-05-18 19:58 ` Alan Cox
2008-05-16 16:22 ` [PATCH, RFC] char dev BKL pushdown Alan Cox
2008-05-16 16:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-05-16 16:43 ` Jonathan Corbet
2008-05-17 21:15 ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-05-18 20:26 ` Jonathan Corbet
2008-05-19 23:07 ` Arnd Bergmann
[not found] ` <200805200111.47275.arnd@arndb.de>
2008-05-19 23:14 ` [PATCH 2/3, RFC] watchdog " Arnd Bergmann
2008-05-20 6:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-05-20 8:30 ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-05-20 15:47 ` Wim Van Sebroeck
2008-05-20 18:31 ` Alan Cox
2008-05-20 21:00 ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-05-22 9:34 ` Alan Cox
2008-05-20 9:08 ` Alan Cox
2008-05-20 8:42 ` Alan Cox
2008-05-19 23:26 ` [PATCH 1/3, RFC] misc char " Arnd Bergmann
2008-05-20 0:07 ` Mike Frysinger
2008-05-20 0:21 ` Jonathan Corbet [this message]
2008-05-20 0:46 ` Mike Frysinger
2008-05-20 8:46 ` Alan Cox
2008-05-20 23:01 ` Mike Frysinger
2008-05-20 23:25 ` Jonathan Corbet
2008-05-21 16:22 ` Mike Frysinger
2008-05-19 23:34 ` [PATCH 3/3, RFC] remove BKL from misc_open() Arnd Bergmann
2008-05-20 15:13 ` [PATCH, RFC] char dev BKL pushdown Jonathan Corbet
2008-05-20 17:21 ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-05-20 18:51 ` Alan Cox
2008-05-17 21:58 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-05-18 20:07 ` Jonathan Corbet
2008-05-14 22:11 ` [announce] "kill the Big Kernel Lock (BKL)" tree Andi Kleen
2008-05-14 22:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-05-14 22:21 ` Andi Kleen
2008-05-15 13:30 ` Alan Cox
2008-05-15 15:05 ` John Stoffel
2008-05-15 15:10 ` Andi Kleen
2008-05-15 15:18 ` John Stoffel
2008-05-15 15:45 ` Andi Kleen
2008-05-15 8:44 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-05-15 14:54 ` Diego Calleja
2008-05-14 21:46 ` Alan Cox
2008-05-14 22:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-05-14 22:15 ` Andi Kleen
2008-05-15 17:41 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-05-15 20:27 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-05-15 20:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-05-15 21:22 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-05-17 0:14 ` Kevin Winchester
2008-05-17 0:37 ` Kevin Winchester
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=30821.1211242876@vena.lwn.net \
--to=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vapier.adi@gmail.com \
--cc=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox