From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S966091AbXBOQfp (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Feb 2007 11:35:45 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S966089AbXBOQfp (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Feb 2007 11:35:45 -0500 Received: from [209.190.27.106] ([209.190.27.106]:44974 "EHLO wombat.diezmil.com" rhost-flags-FAIL-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S966083AbXBOQfo (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Feb 2007 11:35:44 -0500 X-Greylist: delayed 2908 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Thu, 15 Feb 2007 11:35:44 EST Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 10:47:16 -0500 Message-ID: <30987167.1171554435992.JavaMail.root@wombat.diezmil.com> From: cedric.hertault@v2plus.com Reply-To: cedric.hertault@v2plus.com To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [IPV4]: Increase number of possible routing tables to 2^32 In-Reply-To: <200609240001.k8O01VL7008533@hera.kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, It is all I need ! no more 256 routing tables limitation !. But now it is time for me to test it, but i am working on a kernel 2.6.9, do you think it will be good ? Why do I need so much routing tables? I need more than 500 routing tables because my Linux have to work with 500 VLANs !. Do you think that your patch will be integreted in the Linux kernel or it stays limited at 256? A very happy kernel noob :) Cedric Hertault -- This message was sent on behalf of cedric.hertault@v2plus.com at openSubscriber.com http://www.opensubscriber.com/message/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/4967197.html