public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
To: Dhananjay Ugwekar <dhananjay.ugwekar@amd.com>,
	gautham.shenoy@amd.com, rafael@kernel.org,
	viresh.kumar@linaro.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/12] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Use scope based cleanup for cpufreq_policy refs
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2025 11:50:38 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <30e56a47-4201-4f2b-aa6d-0547c0d09c38@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250205112523.201101-12-dhananjay.ugwekar@amd.com>

On 2/5/2025 05:25, Dhananjay Ugwekar wrote:
> There have been instances in past where refcount decrementing is missed
> while exiting a function. Use automatic scope based cleanup to avoid
> such errors.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dhananjay Ugwekar <dhananjay.ugwekar@amd.com>

Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>

> ---
>   drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c | 25 ++++++++-----------------
>   include/linux/cpufreq.h      |  3 +++
>   2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c
> index 6a604f0797d9..ee7e3f0a4c0a 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c
> @@ -548,7 +548,7 @@ static inline bool amd_pstate_sample(struct amd_cpudata *cpudata)
>   static void amd_pstate_update(struct amd_cpudata *cpudata, u8 min_perf,
>   			      u8 des_perf, u8 max_perf, bool fast_switch, int gov_flags)
>   {
> -	struct cpufreq_policy *policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpudata->cpu);
> +	struct cpufreq_policy *policy __free(put_cpufreq_policy) = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpudata->cpu);
>   	u8 nominal_perf = READ_ONCE(cpudata->nominal_perf);
>   
>   	if (!policy)
> @@ -574,8 +574,6 @@ static void amd_pstate_update(struct amd_cpudata *cpudata, u8 min_perf,
>   	}
>   
>   	amd_pstate_update_perf(cpudata, min_perf, des_perf, max_perf, 0, fast_switch);
> -
> -	cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
>   }
>   
>   static int amd_pstate_verify(struct cpufreq_policy_data *policy_data)
> @@ -587,7 +585,8 @@ static int amd_pstate_verify(struct cpufreq_policy_data *policy_data)
>   	 * amd-pstate qos_requests.
>   	 */
>   	if (policy_data->min == FREQ_QOS_MIN_DEFAULT_VALUE) {
> -		struct cpufreq_policy *policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(policy_data->cpu);
> +		struct cpufreq_policy *policy __free(put_cpufreq_policy) =
> +					      cpufreq_cpu_get(policy_data->cpu);
>   		struct amd_cpudata *cpudata;
>   
>   		if (!policy)
> @@ -595,7 +594,6 @@ static int amd_pstate_verify(struct cpufreq_policy_data *policy_data)
>   
>   		cpudata = policy->driver_data;
>   		policy_data->min = cpudata->lowest_nonlinear_freq;
> -		cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
>   	}
>   
>   	cpufreq_verify_within_cpu_limits(policy_data);
> @@ -678,7 +676,7 @@ static void amd_pstate_adjust_perf(unsigned int cpu,
>   				   unsigned long capacity)
>   {
>   	u8 max_perf, min_perf, des_perf, cap_perf, min_limit_perf;
> -	struct cpufreq_policy *policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
> +	struct cpufreq_policy *policy __free(put_cpufreq_policy) = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
>   	struct amd_cpudata *cpudata;
>   
>   	if (!policy)
> @@ -710,7 +708,6 @@ static void amd_pstate_adjust_perf(unsigned int cpu,
>   
>   	amd_pstate_update(cpudata, min_perf, des_perf, max_perf, true,
>   			policy->governor->flags);
> -	cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
>   }
>   
>   static int amd_pstate_cpu_boost_update(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, bool on)
> @@ -824,28 +821,23 @@ static void amd_pstate_init_prefcore(struct amd_cpudata *cpudata)
>   
>   static void amd_pstate_update_limits(unsigned int cpu)
>   {
> -	struct cpufreq_policy *policy = NULL;
> +	struct cpufreq_policy *policy __free(put_cpufreq_policy) = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
>   	struct amd_cpudata *cpudata;
>   	u32 prev_high = 0, cur_high = 0;
> -	int ret;
>   	bool highest_perf_changed = false;
>   
>   	if (!amd_pstate_prefcore)
>   		return;
>   
> -	policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
>   	if (!policy)
>   		return;
>   
> -	cpudata = policy->driver_data;
> -
>   	guard(mutex)(&amd_pstate_driver_lock);
>   
> -	ret = amd_get_highest_perf(cpu, &cur_high);
> -	if (ret) {
> -		cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
> +	if (amd_get_highest_perf(cpu, &cur_high))
>   		return;
> -	}
> +
> +	cpudata = policy->driver_data;
>   
>   	prev_high = READ_ONCE(cpudata->prefcore_ranking);
>   	highest_perf_changed = (prev_high != cur_high);
> @@ -855,7 +847,6 @@ static void amd_pstate_update_limits(unsigned int cpu)
>   		if (cur_high < CPPC_MAX_PERF)
>   			sched_set_itmt_core_prio((int)cur_high, cpu);
>   	}
> -	cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
>   }
>   
>   /*
> diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> index 7fe0981a7e46..dde5212d256c 100644
> --- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> @@ -210,6 +210,9 @@ static inline struct cpufreq_policy *cpufreq_cpu_get(unsigned int cpu)
>   static inline void cpufreq_cpu_put(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) { }
>   #endif
>   
> +/* Scope based cleanup macro for cpufreq_policy kobject reference counting */
> +DEFINE_FREE(put_cpufreq_policy, struct cpufreq_policy *, if (_T) cpufreq_cpu_put(_T))
> +
>   static inline bool policy_is_inactive(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>   {
>   	return cpumask_empty(policy->cpus);


  reply	other threads:[~2025-02-05 17:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-05 11:25 [PATCH 00/12] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Fixes and optimizations Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-05 11:25 ` [PATCH 01/12] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Remove the goto label in amd_pstate_update_limits Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-05 17:40   ` Mario Limonciello
2025-02-10  5:12   ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2025-02-05 11:25 ` [PATCH 02/12] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Fix max_perf updation with schedutil Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-05 17:40   ` Mario Limonciello
2025-02-10  5:13   ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2025-02-05 11:25 ` [PATCH 03/12] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Modify the min_perf calculation in adjust_perf callback Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-05 17:45   ` Mario Limonciello
2025-02-10  9:45   ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2025-02-05 11:25 ` [PATCH 04/12] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Remove the redundant des_perf clamping in adjust_perf Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-05 17:45   ` Mario Limonciello
2025-02-10  9:46   ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2025-02-05 11:25 ` [PATCH 05/12] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Pass min/max_limit_perf as min/max_perf to amd_pstate_update Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-05 17:45   ` Mario Limonciello
2025-02-10  9:47   ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2025-02-05 11:25 ` [PATCH 06/12] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Convert all perf values to u8 Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-05 17:46   ` Mario Limonciello
2025-02-10  9:48   ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2025-02-05 11:25 ` [PATCH 07/12] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Modularize perf<->freq conversion Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-05 17:46   ` Mario Limonciello
2025-02-10  9:51   ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2025-02-05 11:25 ` [PATCH 08/12] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Remove the unnecessary cpufreq_update_policy call Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-05 17:46   ` Mario Limonciello
2025-02-10  9:52   ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2025-02-05 11:25 ` [PATCH 09/12] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Fix cpufreq_policy ref counting Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-05 17:48   ` Mario Limonciello
2025-02-10 10:52   ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2025-02-05 11:25 ` [PATCH 10/12] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Add missing NULL ptr check in amd_pstate_update Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-05 17:48   ` Mario Limonciello
2025-02-10 10:58   ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2025-02-05 11:25 ` [PATCH 11/12] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Use scope based cleanup for cpufreq_policy refs Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-05 17:50   ` Mario Limonciello [this message]
2025-02-10 11:11   ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2025-02-05 11:25 ` [PATCH 12/12] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Remove the unncecessary driver_lock in amd_pstate_update_limits Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-05 17:50   ` Mario Limonciello
2025-02-10 11:12   ` Gautham R. Shenoy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=30e56a47-4201-4f2b-aa6d-0547c0d09c38@amd.com \
    --to=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
    --cc=dhananjay.ugwekar@amd.com \
    --cc=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox