From: Eric Mudama <edmudama@gmail.com>
To: Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Brad Campbell <brad@wasp.net.au>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: Crashed Drive, libata wedges when trying to recover data
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2004 18:10:46 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <311601c904090317107136bd43@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87k6vbs0a9.fsf@stark.xeocode.com>
On 03 Sep 2004 13:57:34 -0400, Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu> wrote:
>
> Eric Mudama <edmudama@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > Boom, you're deadlocked. This means that in SATA, the only way to overcome
> > this deadlock in the driver is to have the host/board generate a COMRESET
> > OOB burst to hard-reset the drive.
>
> So now I'm wondering if there's a way to coerce the libata drivers to generate
> this?
>
> > Today's (and tomorrow's) generation of SATA drives will never ever
> > generate a 0x59 status... the error and DRQ bits become mutually
> > exclusive. However, unfortunately, there are quite a few drives in
> > the field which have this behavior...
>
> I read somewhere that the current generation of SATA drives from everyone
> except Seagate were really PATA with a "bridge". It sounded like BS to me, but
> is that why they're behaving like PATA drives as far as these error codes? Or
> is it simply a question of the shared firmware codebase?
Our (Maxtor's) first generation of SATA drives were all bridged
products. Our new drive (slowly appearing today) is a native sata
product that support NCQ.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-04 0:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-02 8:32 Crashed Drive, libata wedges when trying to recover data Greg Stark
2004-09-02 9:05 ` Brad Campbell
2004-09-03 4:52 ` Greg Stark
2004-09-03 5:13 ` Greg Stark
2004-09-03 11:08 ` Alan Cox
2004-09-03 14:27 ` Greg Stark
2004-09-03 13:53 ` Alan Cox
2004-09-03 15:58 ` Greg Stark
2004-09-03 15:09 ` Alan Cox
2004-09-03 16:47 ` Greg Stark
2004-09-03 17:08 ` Eric Mudama
2004-09-03 17:35 ` Greg Stark
2004-09-03 17:57 ` Greg Stark
2004-09-03 19:45 ` Brad Campbell
2004-09-04 0:10 ` Eric Mudama [this message]
2004-09-03 12:51 ` Brad Campbell
2004-09-03 14:09 ` Alan Cox
2004-09-04 21:58 ` Greg Stark
2004-09-05 4:02 ` Brad Campbell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=311601c904090317107136bd43@mail.gmail.com \
--to=edmudama@gmail.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=brad@wasp.net.au \
--cc=gsstark@mit.edu \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox