From: "Eric D. Mudama" <edmudama@gmail.com>
To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Cc: Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@gmx.de>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SATA NCQ support
Date: Sun, 29 May 2005 20:35:08 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <311601c9050529193515222ba2@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4299EF74.9060506@pobox.com>
On 5/29/05, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com> wrote:
> Matthias Andree wrote:
> > Do I take this as SATA is faster than legacy ATA? In what respect?
> > UDMA/33 and SATA I shouldn't be much different if I use the same drive,
> > or is there something?
>
> It is "likely" to be faster. Faster bus, newer technology.
>
> Jeff
The biggest improvement comes because the drives that ship with the
newer bus technology are newer internally too, they aren't just
repackaged older technology.
Today's current generation products (SATA and PATA100/133) can sustain
over 60MB/s datarates, and the next will probably be even higher.
The drive that could only do UDMA/33 is probably of a disk technology
around 15MB/s or worse.
Today's newest drives are quite fast.
--eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-05-30 2:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-05-27 7:03 [PATCH] SATA NCQ support Jens Axboe
2005-05-27 7:22 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-05-27 7:30 ` Jens Axboe
2005-05-27 7:37 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-05-27 7:47 ` Jens Axboe
2005-05-27 7:56 ` Jens Axboe
2005-05-27 8:24 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-05-27 8:27 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-05-27 8:28 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-05-27 8:35 ` Jens Axboe
2005-05-27 8:38 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-05-27 8:42 ` Jens Axboe
2005-05-27 23:47 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-05-27 13:18 ` Matthias Andree
2005-05-27 13:53 ` Jens Axboe
2005-05-27 14:46 ` Matthias Andree
2005-05-27 14:58 ` Jens Axboe
2005-05-29 13:16 ` Matthias Andree
2005-05-29 16:36 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-05-30 2:35 ` Eric D. Mudama [this message]
2005-05-30 3:41 ` Greg Stark
2005-05-30 4:04 ` Eric D. Mudama
2005-05-30 6:21 ` Greg Stark
2005-05-30 6:33 ` Jens Axboe
2005-05-30 12:16 ` Jens Axboe
2005-05-30 12:37 ` Jens Axboe
2005-05-30 14:51 ` Jens Axboe
2005-05-27 16:00 ` Jeff Garzik
[not found] <48Hix-88s-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <48N4N-4B5-25@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <48Pzt-6Kb-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
2005-05-31 0:00 ` Robert Hancock
2005-05-31 1:21 ` Jeff Garzik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=311601c9050529193515222ba2@mail.gmail.com \
--to=edmudama@gmail.com \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthias.andree@gmx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox