From: Patrice CHOTARD <patrice.chotard@foss.st.com>
To: "Raphaël Gallais-Pou" <rgallaispou@gmail.com>,
"Alain Volmat" <alain.volmat@foss.st.com>,
"Maarten Lankhorst" <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
"Maxime Ripard" <mripard@kernel.org>,
"Thomas Zimmermann" <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
"David Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com>,
"Simona Vetter" <simona@ffwll.ch>,
"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
"Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@kernel.org>
Cc: <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] STi device-tree display subsystem rework
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2025 08:05:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <31279611-bf8a-45b9-854e-7fd09d725661@foss.st.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <235312e0-b912-4e10-874a-e6364131aaee@gmail.com>
On 9/17/25 00:03, Raphaël Gallais-Pou wrote:
>
>
> Le 17/07/2025 à 21:15, Raphael Gallais-Pou a écrit :
>> This serie aims to rework the display-subsystem node, which was
>> previously included directly within the SoC node. This was wrong
>> because it is an abstraction and describes how IPs behave together, not
>> what the hardware is. Instead, extract display-subsystem outside of the
>> SoC node, and let IPs describe their connections. Doing so helps the
>> readability, and eases the understanding of the hardware.
>>
>> Several nodes have been renamed to stick to the generic names defined in
>> the device-tree specification.
>>
>> This series depends on another sent a few days ago. It is not critical
>> though, since not having it only triggers warnings when building
>> deprecated device-trees. Please see link below.
>>
>> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250714-sti-rework-v2-0-f4274920858b@gmail.com
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Raphael Gallais-Pou <rgallaispou@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> Raphael Gallais-Pou (4):
>> drm/sti: check dma_set_coherent_mask return value
>> drm/sti: make use of drm_of_component_probe
>> ARM: dts: sti: extract display subsystem out of soc
>> ARM: dts: sti: remove useless cells fields
>>
> Hi,
>
> @Patrice
> Would you agree to make the device-tree patches go through drm-misc instead of your tree ? So that the breaking change lands in -next in the same time as the driver changes.
>
Hi Raphael
Yes of course.
Thanks
Patrice
> I will send another series to convert display subsystem bindings to DT schema as soon as the series is merged.
>
> @Alain
> Do you prefer to merge it yourself or you rather let me do it ?
>
> Best regards,
> Raphaël> arch/arm/boot/dts/st/stih410.dtsi | 316 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
>> drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_drv.c | 18 +--
>> 2 files changed, 192 insertions(+), 142 deletions(-)
>> ---
>> base-commit: b9a572f471993d3e8bf874fcb57f331d66650440
>> change-id: 20250401-sti-rework-b009551a362c
>>
>> Best regards,
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-17 6:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-17 19:15 [PATCH 0/4] STi device-tree display subsystem rework Raphael Gallais-Pou
2025-07-17 19:15 ` [PATCH 1/4] drm/sti: check dma_set_coherent_mask return value Raphael Gallais-Pou
2025-09-12 14:28 ` Alain Volmat
2025-07-17 19:15 ` [PATCH 2/4] drm/sti: make use of drm_of_component_probe Raphael Gallais-Pou
2025-09-12 14:31 ` Alain Volmat
2025-07-17 19:15 ` [PATCH 3/4] ARM: dts: sti: extract display subsystem out of soc Raphael Gallais-Pou
2025-09-12 14:34 ` Alain Volmat
2025-10-30 7:42 ` Patrice CHOTARD
2025-07-17 19:15 ` [PATCH 4/4] ARM: dts: sti: remove useless cells fields Raphael Gallais-Pou
2025-09-12 14:34 ` Alain Volmat
2025-10-30 7:43 ` Patrice CHOTARD
2025-07-20 23:06 ` [PATCH 0/4] STi device-tree display subsystem rework Rob Herring (Arm)
2025-09-16 22:03 ` Raphaël Gallais-Pou
2025-09-17 6:05 ` Patrice CHOTARD [this message]
2025-09-23 9:12 ` Alain Volmat
2025-10-30 12:24 ` Raphael Gallais-Pou
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=31279611-bf8a-45b9-854e-7fd09d725661@foss.st.com \
--to=patrice.chotard@foss.st.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=alain.volmat@foss.st.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=rgallaispou@gmail.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox