From: jthumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>
Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
"Ewan D. Milne" <emilne@redhat.com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 0/2] Update SCSI target removal path
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 08:58:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <31317011e72e1beb610c6ba3a28ee92c@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1459356208.2509.9.camel@HansenPartnership.com>
On 2016-03-30 18:43, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-03-30 at 09:09 +0200, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
>> [resend with linux-scsi@ in Cc, my apologies]
>>
>> This is a follow up to "scsi: Add intermediate STARGET_REMOVE state
>> to scsi_target_state".
>>
>> If anyone has an idea how to create a regression test suite for the
>> target removal path I'd be all ears, given the fact that this is the
>> 3rd or 4th patch targeting it.
>
> Actually, could you reverse the order of these patches, please. It's
> not safe to revert the soft lockup fix until after the intermediate
> state is introduced. I'd rather we didn't go through a point in the
> tree where the bug exists again.
You're right. I'll resend the series in reverse order.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-31 6:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-30 7:09 [RESEND PATCH v2 0/2] Update SCSI target removal path Johannes Thumshirn
2016-03-30 7:09 ` [RESEND PATCH v2 1/2] Revert "scsi: fix soft lockup in scsi_remove_target() on module removal" Johannes Thumshirn
2016-03-30 16:23 ` Ewan D. Milne
2016-03-30 7:09 ` [RESEND PATCH v2 2/2] scsi: Add intermediate STARGET_REMOVE state to scsi_target_state Johannes Thumshirn
2016-03-30 16:25 ` Ewan D. Milne
2016-03-30 16:43 ` [RESEND PATCH v2 0/2] Update SCSI target removal path James Bottomley
2016-03-31 6:58 ` jthumshirn [this message]
[not found] ` <108843b606da2c793bd830af42d5907bf8776d13.1459249252.git.jthumshirn__45300.0338202857$1459322118$gmane$org@suse.de>
2016-03-30 21:44 ` [RESEND PATCH v2 2/2] scsi: Add intermediate STARGET_REMOVE state to scsi_target_state Sebastian Herbszt
2016-03-31 7:24 ` jthumshirn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=31317011e72e1beb610c6ba3a28ee92c@suse.de \
--to=jthumshirn@suse.de \
--cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=emilne@redhat.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox