public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@mleia.com>
Cc: Roland Stigge <stigge@antcom.de>,
	Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Sylvain Lemieux <slemieux.tyco@gmail.com>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] MAINTAINERS: add new maintainers of NXP LPC32xx SoC
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 01:14:55 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3148840.0dvKHvK2Ga@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <57229868.30403@mleia.com>

On Friday 29 April 2016 02:10:32 Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
> Hi Arnd,
> 
> On 27.04.2016 12:39, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Wednesday 27 April 2016 02:55:16 Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
> >> Roland Stigge added initial support of NXP LPC32xx SoC series and
> >> first boards powered by it, but for a while since v3.18-rc1 the
> >> SoC support is unmaintained and became stale.
> >>
> >> Vladimir Zapolskiy and Sylvain Lemieux expressed interest in
> >> continuation of NXP LPC32xx maintenance, reflect this in MAINTAINERS
> >> record file for better communication with Linux kernel community.
> >>
> >> The maintenance change is in agreement with Arnd Bergmann:
> >>
> > 
> > Looks good. Let's give Roland some time to reply (hopefully with
> > and Ack), and then merge it for 4.7.
> > 
> 
> to simplify the matter and to legitimate the process somehow I decided
> not to include this change of maintainers into my last LPC32xx SoC pull
> request, hence the pull request contains only code changes.
> 
> In other words please let me explicitly delegate a decision to you or
> other ARM maintainers when and which way to apply this change. As for
> me here I would prefer to get Signed-off-by tags from one of you.
> 
> If I'm worried for nothing, or if you don't consider to pick these
> changes up directly from linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, for
> your convenience I'll send a pull request to arm@kernel.org.

It's all fine with me. My plan so far is to pick up the patches
separately in a couple of days, but if you send a pull request,
I'll take that instead. If Roland still wants to be listed in
the MAINTAINERS file, we can change it again, but I'm considering
the two of you the primary contacts now.

	Arnd

  reply	other threads:[~2016-04-28 23:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-26 23:55 [PATCH 0/3] MAINTAINERS: add new maintainers of NXP LPC32xx SoC Vladimir Zapolskiy
2016-04-26 23:55 ` [PATCH 1/3] MAINTAINERS: move ARM/NXP LPC32xx record to ARM section Vladimir Zapolskiy
2016-04-26 23:55 ` [PATCH 2/3] MAINTAINERS: add new maintainers of NXP LPC32xx SoC Vladimir Zapolskiy
2016-04-26 23:55 ` [PATCH 3/3] MAINTAINERS: add ARM/NXP LPC32XX SoC specific drivers to the section Vladimir Zapolskiy
2016-04-27  9:39 ` [PATCH 0/3] MAINTAINERS: add new maintainers of NXP LPC32xx SoC Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-28 23:10   ` Vladimir Zapolskiy
2016-04-28 23:14     ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2016-04-29  0:02       ` Vladimir Zapolskiy
2016-05-09 13:37 ` Arnd Bergmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3148840.0dvKHvK2Ga@wuerfel \
    --to=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=khilman@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=olof@lixom.net \
    --cc=slemieux.tyco@gmail.com \
    --cc=stigge@antcom.de \
    --cc=vz@mleia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox