From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 23 Jun 2001 20:06:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 23 Jun 2001 20:05:52 -0400 Received: from t2.redhat.com ([199.183.24.243]:51698 "EHLO passion.cambridge.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 23 Jun 2001 20:05:51 -0400 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.3 01/15/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 From: David Woodhouse X-Accept-Language: en_GB In-Reply-To: <0106221013280M.00692@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <0106221013280M.00692@localhost.localdomain> <20010621160309.A6744@thyrsus.com> <20010622094934.A13075@thyrsus.com> <9gvj2g$khc$1@picard.cistron.nl> To: landley@webofficenow.com Cc: wichert@cistron.nl (Wichert Akkerman), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Missing help entries in 2.4.6pre5 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 01:05:45 +0100 Message-ID: <31580.993341145@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org landley@webofficenow.com said: > There's a really simple solution to that. Eric can just make up his > own help file entries that are wildly inaccurate and actively > insulting to whoever it is who owns the symbol. Heh. Lets not be too harsh though. Chasing people who add config options without help text is a thankless task for the most part, but I'm grateful to ESR for doing it. I must admit I was actually counting on him to catch the ones I'd missed. It was only when he ignored my patch which removed an offending symbol and explained the status of a couple of false positives, and kept asking about them instead of placing them on his 'ignore' list that it became irritating. I objected, he assures me they're on the ignore list now, and we're all happy. -- dwmw2