Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: rockchip: Track more files

[Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>]

Am Montag, 9. Dezember 2019, 09:18:00 CET schrieb Kever Yang:
> Hi Miquel,
> 
> On 2019/12/4 下午5:07, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> > The current list misses a lot of drivers not prefixed or suffixed by
> > "rockchip". For instance, there are plenty drivers called rk808 and
> > rk805 which are currently not tracked (clk, regulator, pinctrl, RTC,
> > MFD, includes, bindings). Add them to the list under the Rockchip
> > entry.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
> > ---
> >
> > Hi Heiko,
> >
> > You are right we should try to check more often your tree. Also, here
> > is a patch so that you are Cc'ed for all Rockchip related patches
> > because the current list is not exhaustive at all (not sure it is
> > voluntary or not though).
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Miquèl
> >
> >   MAINTAINERS | 4 ++++
> >   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> > index cba1095547fd..a9564e6cb872 100644
> > --- a/MAINTAINERS
> > +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> > @@ -2198,12 +2198,16 @@ L:	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
> >   T:	git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mmind/linux-rockchip.git
> >   S:	Maintained
> >   F:	Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-rk3x.txt
> > +F:	Documentation/devicetree/bindings/*/*rk80*
> >   F:	arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3*
> >   F:	arch/arm/boot/dts/rv1108*
> >   F:	arch/arm/mach-rockchip/
> > +F:	include/*/*/rk808.h
> > +F:	include/*/*/*/rk808.h
> >   F:	drivers/clk/rockchip/
> >   F:	drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rk3x.c
> >   F:	drivers/*/*rockchip*
> > +F:	drivers/*/*rk80*
> >   F:	drivers/*/*/*rockchip*
> >   F:	sound/soc/rockchip/
> >   N:	rockchip
> For the Rockchip PMIC, is it better to have a NEW MAINTAINER entry like 
> "ROCKCHIP PMIC DRIVER"
> which share the same mailing list linux-rockchip@, because there is not 
> only rk808,
> but also rk805, rk809, rk817, rk818, and may be more to come.
> 
> BTW, we should use 'rk8' instead of 'rk80' to match all the Rockchip PMICs.

yep, I agree with Kever on this ... also that new pmic-related entry should
not really link to a git tree as patches for it will get distributed through
multiple trees (mfd, regulator, rtc) most of the time.

Miquel can you do a v2 please?

Thanks
Heiko