From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754281Ab0DTKMY (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Apr 2010 06:12:24 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:16867 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754136Ab0DTKMX (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Apr 2010 06:12:23 -0400 Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: <1271355219-20714-7-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <1271355219-20714-7-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20100415181255.GA19588@linux.vnet.ibm.com> To: "Paul E. McKenney" Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca, josh@joshtriplett.org, dvhltc@us.ibm.com, niv@us.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, eric.dumazet@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 07/16] rcu: shrink rcutiny by making synchronize_rcu_bh() be inline Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 11:11:06 +0100 Message-ID: <31621.1271758266@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Does it make sense for synchronize_sched() to be inline too? Since that's just a wrapper around cond_resched(), which is normally just a wrapper around _cond_resched(). Otherwise: Acked-by: David Howells